Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Stroop Performance: Tackling the Lateralization

By Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne; De Raedt, Rudi et al. | Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2009 | Go to article overview

Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Stroop Performance: Tackling the Lateralization


Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne, De Raedt, Rudi, Baeken, Chris, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review


Neuroscience research has identified the involvement of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in cognitive control. Questions remain, however, about its lateralization correlates during Stroop task performance, an experimental cornerstone on which a large amount of cognitive control research is based. After reviewing the literature, we find that three Stroop variants have been used in an attempt to uncover different aspects of cognitive control related to DLPFC involvement. In sum, rapid and sequential up-regulation of the attentional set seems to be related to the left DLPFC. These attentional adjustments are based on participants' expectancies regarding the conflicting nature of the upcoming trial, and not on the conflict itself. In contrast, the right DLPFC is associated with an overall up-regulation of the attentional set when attentional conflict is experienced.

Theoretical Background

Cognitive control can be conceptualized as the capacity to suppress prepotent but incorrect responses and the ability to filter out irrelevant information within a stimulus set (Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen, 2001). Experimental conflict situations that require cognitive control have been found in tasks that demand overriding of prepotent responses, such as in the Stroop (1935) paradigm. The Stroop interference effect is one of the most frequently used tasks in cognitive psychology, clinical neuropsychology, and cognitive neuroscience. In a Stroop color-naming task, participants have to name the ink color of a printed color word, and greater conflict occurs for incongruent (e.g., the word red in green ink) than for congruent (e.g., the word red in red ink) trials-in other words, the Stroop interference effect.

Neuroimaging techniques can be used to investigate the brain correlates of cognitive control during experiments. Such activation techniques include PET (positron emission tomography), fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), and ERPs (event-related potentials). These neuroimaging techniques face the critical problem, though, of distinguishing cause from effect, because no interference with brain activity is provoked. As a noninvasive tool for stimulation of the human cerebral cortex, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induces alterations of neuronal activity that have an effect on cognition; this is becoming a promising technique for investigating whether a particular area is essential for task performance.

Different neurocognitive studies have revealed that cognitive control is related to a specific cortico-subcortical circuit, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (e.g., Barber & Carter, 2005; MacDonald, Cohen, Stenger, & Carter, 2000). According to the prominent conflict-monitoring hypothesis (Botvinick et al., 2001; Botvinick, Nystrom, Fissell, Carter, & Cohen, 1999), the occurrence of response conflict is signaled by the ACC, leading to recruitment in the DLPFC of more cognitive control for subsequent performance. This involvement of the DLPFC (Brodmann area [BA] 9/46) has been identified in neuroscience research with top-down regulatory processes of cognitive control. Overall, BA 9 includes the superior and inferior frontal gyrus, whereas BA 46 includes the middle frontal gyrus.

For a number of years, the correlates of top-down attentional control were thought to reflect the integrity of the left frontal cortex and the cortico-subcortical circuit (Swick & Jovanovic, 2002). However, recent literature has demonstrated a more heterogeneous picture of lateralization with respect to cognitive control and the DLPFC. Notably, the lateralization of control processes seems to be task-specific (Kerns et al., 2004; Miller & Cohen, 2001; Rubia et al., 2006). Since the Stroop interference effect remains a cornerstone on which the conflict-monitoring model is based, this review article focuses on lateralized processes of cognitive control based on different Stroop designs that have been used. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Stroop Performance: Tackling the Lateralization
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.