The Archaeology of African History*

By Stahl, Ann B. | The International Journal of African Historical Studies, May 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

The Archaeology of African History*

Stahl, Ann B., The International Journal of African Historical Studies

In the beginning, historians of Africa put great store by archeology.1

Historians and archaeologists interested in Africa's pasts once envisioned themselves as working toward broadly similar goals using complementary sources and methods in a collaborative interdisciplinary project. Archaeology's value was perceived to lay in its potential to inform on the longue durée of African societies, to provide evidence of daily life (e.g., subsistence, settlement), and to validate insights drawn from other sources. The regularity with which the Journal of African History published overviews of radiocarbon dates underscored archaeology's role in providing a chronological framework for African history.2 Thus, in an early contribution on methods, Jan Vansina, Raymond Mauny, and L. V. Thomas forecast that "the contribution of the archaeologist to African history is not marginal."3

"Not marginal" perhaps, but certainly bracketed in relation to select contexts and periods. Several decades after the first flush of enthusiasm for interdisciplinary approaches, the multivolume Cambridge and UNESCO histories of Africa captured the temporal division of labor that had emerged between historians and archaeologists. In the nine volume Cambridge History of Africa published from 1975-1986, archaeological papers dominated Volume 1 and were prevalent in Volume 2; however, by Volume 3, covering the period AD 1050-1600, Neville Chittick alone bore archaeology's standard in his chapter on coastal East Africa. Volumes 4-9 included no archaeological chapters.4 A similar pattern held in the eight- volume UNESCO General History of Africa- published between 1981 and 1993.5 This temporal division of labor reflected the concerns of archaeologists at the time, preoccupied as Anglo-American-inspired archaeology was with studying questions of origins and migration, building chronological frameworks, and its attention firmly focused on "pre-colonial" contexts.6 Although one can identify exceptional scholars on both sides of the disciplinary divide who have drawn on both historical and archaeological sources, the rarity with which papers have been co-authored by archaeologists and historians similarly indicates how an early vision of collaborative research failed to materialize and allowed disciplinary boundaries in African historical studies to remain intact.7

In practice, twentieth-century historians valued archaeology primarily as a source of chronological insight for periods when other sources were unavailable; however, archaeology's value in this regard was diminished by two developments. First, the interest in precolonial history that characterized mid-century African history gave way to a more substantive focus on colonial and post-colonial history for which archaeological chronologies were deemed irrelevant. Second, scholars began to recognize the imprecision of radiocarbon chronologies for recent centuries due to atmospheric fluctuations in radiocarbon concentrations through time. Transforming radiocarbon age estimates to a calendric scale requires calibration with a dendrochronological curve that, because of extreme fluctuations in atmospheric radiocarbon concentrations over the last 500 years, renders dates so imprecise that contexts younger than 500 years effectively cannot be dated by radiocarbon methods.8 Both developments contributed to a sense that historical reconstruction could proceed without the "mute"9 material evidence of archaeology.

Thus, by millennium's end, the mid-century optimism regarding archaeology's contribution to African history had faded. In 1995, when Vansina asked historians if archaeologists were their siblings, he wrote of disillusion, disinterest, an incompatibility in sources, temporalities, and analytical goals born of disparate theoretical perspectives. He bemoaned the inattention in Anglo-American-inspired archaeology to historical contingency and the "daily circumstances of life."10 The dissonances were clear in instances when scholars attempted to "blend an archeological reconstruction of an earlier period with a subsequent historical one,"11 a quote that underscores the extent to which archaeology's role was confined to 'pre'-history (admittedly an outcome that flowed in large measure from the preoccupations of archaeologists with origins questions). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

The Archaeology of African History*


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.