How to Make the Much-Needed Employee Free Choice Act Politically Acceptable

By Craver, Charles B. | Labor Law Journal, Summer 2009 | Go to article overview

How to Make the Much-Needed Employee Free Choice Act Politically Acceptable


Craver, Charles B., Labor Law Journal


I. Introduction

American labor law has reached a critical point. Private sector union membership has declined from 35 percent in 19543 to 7.6 percent today.4 The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA),5 which was enacted in 1935 to protect the rights of employees to form, join, and assist labor organizations and to select exclusive bargaining agents to negotiate their basic terms of employment, has become an outdated and anemic statute. When the NLRA was passed, the United States was a mass production economy dominated by relatively large corporate employers, most of whose employees desired union representation. The existing American Federation of Labor (AFL), which consisted primarily of trade unions representing skilled craft workers, did not know how its union affiliates could effectively organize industrial bargaining units consisting of skilled, semi-skilled, and unskilled workers. It formed the Committee for Industrial Organization to develop a strategic plan. AFL leaders hoped to organize employees in the automobile, steel, rubber, and electrical manufacturing industries and divide those individuals among different trade unions. When it became clear to union leaders on the Committee for Industrial Organization that such a system would not work well for industrial workers, they withdrew from the AFL and formed the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO).

CIO leaders quickly established the United Automobile Workers Union, the Steel workers Union, the Rubber Workers Union, and the Electrical Workers Union, and these new entities began to organize the manufacturing facilities in their respective industries. Although many employers initially opposed union organization, the combination of the new National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and strong union efforts overcame employer opposition. The vast majority of industrial workers desired a collective voice, and they selected industrial unions to represent them. From the enactment of the NLRA in 1935 until the Taft-Hartley Act amendments in 1947, labor organizations could ob- tain NLRB certification through either secret ballot elections, or "any other suitable method" to determine if a ma- jority of workers in an appropriate bargaining unit desired a collective voice. In many cases, once it became clear that a majority of employees in particular bargaining units had signed authorization cards designating specific unions as their bargaining agents, employers voluntarily extended recognition to those labor organizations without the need to utilize the NLRB elections process.

During the 1940s and 1950s, competition between AFL and CIO affiliates was significant, and private sector union membership grew from 15 percent in 1935 to 35 percent in 1955.6 At that time, AFL and CIO unions decided to reunite in the AFL-CIO.7 Despite recent predictions by current opponents of changes to the current labor laws suggesting that increased union membership would greatly increase unemployment, the U.S. did not experience such a problem when unions represented over one-third of the labor force. What we did see during that period was a willingness of employers to share firm success with workers, in the form of generous wages and fringe benefits, creating a sizable blue-collar middle class. Nonetheless, corporate leaders were becoming concerned about diminishing profits caused by increased labor costs generated through the collective bargaining process.8 As a result, a growing number of unorganized firms decided to work harder to prevent the unionization of their employees.

American business leaders also engaged in political activity to limit the rights and economic power possessed by labor organizations and their supporters. In 1947, they induced Congress to enact the Labor-Management Rela- tions Act (LMRA)9 amendments to the NLRA. These statutory changes prohibited a number of unfair labor practices by labor organizations, and restricted the capacity of unions to employ secondary activity to enhance their bargaining power vis-à-vis primary employers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

How to Make the Much-Needed Employee Free Choice Act Politically Acceptable
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.