From Land-Use to 'Spatial Planning': Reflections on the Reform of the English Planning System

By Shaw, David; Lord, Alex | The Town Planning Review, July 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

From Land-Use to 'Spatial Planning': Reflections on the Reform of the English Planning System


Shaw, David, Lord, Alex, The Town Planning Review


The reform of the English planning system effected by the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act sought to re-brand planning as a positive instrument designed to help maintain, create and/or recreate sustainable communities. The terminology through which this purported transition from a system which was perceived to be regulatory and bureaucratic in character to one in which practising planners coordinate, orchestrate and manage the changing nature of communities is very much redolent of the vocabulary by which the political philosophy of the Third Way has been communicated. In this article, we explore the origins of the new system in these political ideals and the extent to which English planners are, in accord with the intentions of the new system, reaching beyond narrow land-use regulation to develop a more coordinated and consensus-based approach to planning practice. The article draws upon the results of a major three-year research project Spatial Plans in Practice, funded by the UK government, to provide an empirical reflection on the experiences of planning professionals over the first three years of the new system's operation.

In 2004, following a fundamental review of the previous system, a new system of spatial planning for England was introduced by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act. The intention of the legislation was to broaden the scope of planning practice and revise the widely held perception that planning and planners had become peripheral in many local authorities due to a preoccupation with procedural, bureaucratic issues. By contrast, the 2004 reforms anticipated a planning profession at the core of the place-making agenda and a plan-making process more clearly rooted in evidence with a greater degree of stakeholder involvement. Given the potential contrast between this vision of twenty-first century planning and the more overtly regulatory nature of the pre-2004 system(s) it has been noted that, for these ambitious reforms to be realised, a significant culture change would be required in the way that all stakeholders engage with the planning process (Shaw and Lord, 2007). In this article we investigate the conceptual and theoretical origins of the 2004 reforms before assessing the extent to which they have been implemented.

Research with which the authors have been involved for the last three years, the Spatial Plans in Practice Project (SPiP), is drawn upon to fulfil this empirical component of the paper. This study, commissioned by the then Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, now the Communities and Local Government department, was designed to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the reformed system in England across 25 strategically selected case studies (see Table 1). These case studies were selected in 2004 to represent the variety of planning contexts (e.g. urban, rural, urban fringe, growth area, area of regeneration, etc.) found across England, and those local planning authorities which were most engaged in developing the new local development frameworks. The case studies were not intended to be exemplars of best practice.

Reflecting on the experiences of these 25 local planning authorities potentially provides an insight into the degree to which planning practice has responded to the intentions of the new system. However, to grasp the character of the reforms introduced by the 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act fully, it is first necessary to briefly consider their origins in the pre-2004 system(s).

What's new about the 'new' planning system?

Emerging in a period characterised by a popular consensus regarding the importance of state intervention to manage and plan post-war reconstruction (Ward, 2004) and premised on the nationalisation of land development rights, for Davies (1998, 136) there were five basic principles of the English planning system in its original form which have endured and distinguish it from the more commonly adopted process of regulatory zoning regimes elsewhere:

1. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

From Land-Use to 'Spatial Planning': Reflections on the Reform of the English Planning System
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.