Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education: Intergroup Dialogue Program Student Outcomes and Implications for Campus Radical Climate: A Case Study

By Alimo, Craig; Kelly, Robert et al. | Multicultural Education, Fall 2002 | Go to article overview

Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education: Intergroup Dialogue Program Student Outcomes and Implications for Campus Radical Climate: A Case Study


Alimo, Craig, Kelly, Robert, Clark, Christine, Multicultural Education


Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education:

Intergroup Dialogue Program Student Outcomes and Implications for Campus Radical Climate:

A Case Study1

Introduction

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the cognitive and affective outcomes in students that were participants in the Intergroup Dialogue Program (IDP) at the University of Maryland, College Park.2 This case study describes the impact that this program had on student beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors regarding interaction across difference based on race and/or ethnicity. Knowledge gained from this study is transferable and can assist in the further development of the IDP at the University of Maryland, as well as at others institutions across the country.

Contexts of the Study

This study was conducted in the context of two conjoining projects. The first project is the Diverse Democracy Project3 directed by Dr. Sylvia Hurtado from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. This national project engages ten higher education institutions, varying in size, organization, and mission, from across the country-including the University of Maryland-in seeking to understand how students learn from a variety of social justice education oriented initiatives. Further, the project seeks to "extend the development of promising practices among participating institutions" by exploring:

* How colleges are creating diverse learning environments and are actively preparing students to live and work in an increasingly complex and diverse democracy;

* The role of the diverse peer group in the acquisition of important cognitive, social, and democratic outcomes both inside and outside of classroom environments;

* Student outcomes that can be best achieved through specific kinds of initiatives designed to increase student engagement with diverse perspectives. (University of Michigan, 2000)

The IDP at the University of Maryland is one of the promising practices included in the Diverse Democracy Project.

The second context out of which this research was completed is the Office of Human Relations Programs (OHRP), an arm of the Office of the President, at the University of Maryland. Maryland's IDP is a featured program within OHRP's Student Intercultural Learning Center (SILO). OHRP has dedicated direct and in-kind support toward this study.4 OHRP's SILC piloted Maryland's IDP in the spring of 2000, implementing its full-scale IDP the ensuing fall. Maryland's intergroup dialogues (IDs) are facilitated primarily by OHRP professionals and Graduate Assistants (GAs), and occasionally by faculty, staff, and GAs from other units and/or departments across campus.

This study explored the experiences of the students who were participants in the IDP during the spring semester of 2001 and who signed University of Maryland Institutional Review Board forms. By ensuring that this study engaged the ethical standards and structures of the University of Maryland it also binded and limited it as a case study.

Intergroup Dialogue and Social justice Education

As mentioned in the previous article in this section of Multicultural Education (see Volume 9, Number 4, Summer 2002, pp. 30-32), there are a number of higher education institutions that have developed IDPs on their campuses. These institutions include, but are not limited to, the University ofMassachusetts, Amherst, the University of Michigan, Arizona State University, and the University of Maryland. It is important to reiterate that IDPs on these campuses have been developed as vehicles through which social justice education is taught and practiced; that is, the conceptualization of Intergroup Dialogue (ID) is sociopolitically located.

Social justice education (SJE) is both a pedagogical process as well as a curricular destination (Bell, 1997). "Social Justice Education seeks to create and support learning environments where education is the practice of freedom and where the student and teacher are mutually engaged in the construction and transformation of knowledge into social action and change" (Hackman, 2000). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Diversity Initiatives in Higher Education: Intergroup Dialogue Program Student Outcomes and Implications for Campus Radical Climate: A Case Study
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.