Asia's Institutional Creation and Evolution*

By Komori, Yasumasa | Asian Perspective, July 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

Asia's Institutional Creation and Evolution*


Komori, Yasumasa, Asian Perspective


This article explores the formation and evolution of regional institutions in the Asia-Pacific and East Asia. Employing a historical institutionalist framework, this article argues that both Asia-Pacific and East Asian regional institutions were created at critical junctures, precipitated by extra-regional developments that called the legitimacy of existing institutional mechanisms into serious question. Preexisting institutions greatly shaped the institutional design of the subsequent regional institutions, revealing a path-dependent nature of institutional evolution. The timing and sequence of regional institution building is an important factor for explaining institutional change. Specifically, the analysis demonstrates that although new regional institutions with different memberships have emerged at critical junctures, the centrality of ASEAN as a source of institutional modus operandi has persisted within these institutions, notwithstanding changes in material circumstances and the recognition of inefficiencies and ineffectiveness.

Key words: APEC, ASEAN+3, East Asia Summit, historical institutionalism, regionalism

Introduction

Until the late 1980s, the Asia-Pacific had long been known as a region without any intergovernmental regional institutions. Although some regional organizations were created in the early cold war period, the only regional organization that had continued to exist was the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), formed in 1967. However, after the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum was established in 1989, many regionalist projects emerged at various levels in the Asia-Pacific region. The ASEAN launched the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) as an instrument for attracting foreign direct investment to the region. In the security domain, spurred by the uncertainty after the end of the cold war, the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) was created as the first regional forum to promote security dialogue and confidence- building measures among member states. In 1996, the inaugural Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) brought together leaders from both Asia and Europe to discuss political, economic, and social issues in order to strengthen the relationship between the two regions.

In the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998, a number of regional economic arrangements and proposals emerged in order to develop a new regional financial governance mechanism. The most significant institutional development during this period was the emergence of the first East Asia-only regional forum, which started when ASEAN leaders invited their counterparts from three Northeast Asian countries, namely, China, Japan, and South Korea, to the second ASEAN informal summit in 1997. This East Asian gathering, which came to be known as the ASEAN+3 (APT), gained momentum as a site for promoting regional financial and monetary cooperation among the East Asian economies. More recently, the East Asia Summit (EAS) was inaugurated at the end of 2005, bringing together not only the APT members, but also Australia, New Zealand, and India. As result of these developments, many states in East Asia and the Asia-Pacific now belong to regional arrangements with overlapping membership.

How and why did APEC emerge when it did? Why did the locus of regionalism shift from the Asia-Pacific to East Asia in the late 1990s when a new East Asian regional institution was created in the form of APT? What has informed the institutional forms that these regional institutions have taken? In short, what explains institutional creation and evolution in the Asia-Pacific and East Asia? This article employs a historical institutionalist approach to institutions by way of explanation. The following pages begin with a discussion of the framework, and proceed with an empirical analysis.

Critical Juncture and Path Dependence

Historical institutionalism provides a useful framework for exploring how and why various regional frameworks have emerged in the Asia-Pacific and East Asia. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Asia's Institutional Creation and Evolution*
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.