Best Interests and Parental Presumptions: Bringing Same-Sex Custody Agreements beyond Preclusion by the Federal Defense of Marriage Act

By Schmieder, Alison M. | The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, October 2008 | Go to article overview

Best Interests and Parental Presumptions: Bringing Same-Sex Custody Agreements beyond Preclusion by the Federal Defense of Marriage Act


Schmieder, Alison M., The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal


Whether we believe same-sex couples should be allowed to get married, enter into civil unions, or raise children, the reality is that they do so.1

INTRODUCTION

According to United States Census data for the year 2000, the number of samesex families is on a dramatic rise, with thirty-four percent of lesbian couples and twenty-two percent of gay male couples raising children under eighteen.2 As the number of such non-traditional families increases, so does the need for adequate legal protection. What some classify as "anti-gay legislation" is eroding the ability of samesex parents to safeguard their basic parental rights, specifically with regard to custody and visitation.3 Upon the dissolution of a same-sex relationship or legally recognized union, one parent's relationship to the child is usually shifted to the status of "legal stranger."4 Even if certain individual rights are granted, they often fail to amount to complete recognition as a "legal parent,"5 short-changing homosexual parents and their children in ways traditional families need not even consider.

Courts routinely rely on biology to limit the people claiming to be parents, but "parental rights do not spring full-blown from the biological connection . . . [t]hey require relationships more enduring."6 But traditional families account for a mere one-quarter of the total number of households in the United States, and many of the remaining non-traditional families would be willing to provide stable and healthy homes for children if they were afforded adequate legal protection to ensure that stability.7 If fundamental constitutional rights continue to be extended to traditional nuclear families, it is widely suggested that similar rights be afforded to other non-traditional parents as well.8

Beyond biology, the determination of a custody or visitation agreement is based on a "best interest of the child" standard.9 Some argue, however, that a "habitual commitment and preference of different-sex couple parenting"10 exists, which interferes with the application of the best interest standard to same-sex parents.11 Even if samesex parents are granted custody rights in an agreement, the difficulty in seeking legal protection for these parenting rights is further compounded if one partner moves to a different state after dissolution of the relationship. Ordinarily, the Full Faith and Credit Clause,12 enhanced by the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA),13 protects a parent when his or her ex-spouse changes domiciles.14 But with the enactment of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)15 and subsequent state statutes, same-sex parental rights are in a more tenuous position than ever.16

The enactment of the Federal DOMA, which allows states to decline effect to same-sex marriage related rights,17 has left states to interpret whether the Act was intended to modify the PKPA's extension of full faith and credit to custody agreements granted to same-sex couples in other states. 18 The Virginia and Vermont courts recently addressed this issue as they were pitted against one another in the series of cases surrounding Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins.19 The Virginia Court of Appeals eventually held that the PKPA prevented Virginia's exercise of jurisdiction over a Vermont custody agreement between two same-sex partners after the dissolution of their Vermont civil union.20

The Virginia ruling was a powerful step towards protecting the children of separated same-sex couples because it provided full faith and credit to the previouslyentered Vermont agreement.21 However, the court made it clear that the ruling was a "narrow one of jurisdiction" only,22 leaving the conflicts between full faith and credit, DOMA, and the PKPA open to further - potentially back-pedalling - interpretation. The United States Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari in January of 2008, leaving this issue open for further discussion on a national level. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Best Interests and Parental Presumptions: Bringing Same-Sex Custody Agreements beyond Preclusion by the Federal Defense of Marriage Act
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.