A Grounded Cognition Perspective on Irrational Beliefs in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

By Tiba, Alexandru I. | Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, March 2010 | Go to article overview

A Grounded Cognition Perspective on Irrational Beliefs in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy


Tiba, Alexandru I., Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies


Abstract

Knowledge has been the subject of different controversial theories in psychology; recently the idea that knowledge is grounded in the modal systems of the brain has gained considerable evidence. This paper discusses applications of the grounded cognition theory to irrational beliefs, a main concept of Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), proposed as core cognitive vulnerabilities for emotional disorders. Irrational beliefs, as grounded maladaptive emotional knowledge structures are considered the result of interactions between linguistic representations and simulations in motivational and emotional brain processing circuits. It is proposed that irrational beliefs (e.g., demandingness) are represented by distorted simulations in motivational and emotional brain processing circuits that bias the online processing of activating events. This biased emotional processing generates emotional disturbance. A three-level model of irrational beliefs is presented. The impact of irrational beliefs on emotions can be analyzed at the verbal or linguistic symbols level, at the simulations and modal symbols level and at the level of relations between verbal symbols and modal symbols. Maladaptive mechanisms and proposed corrective cognitive interventions are analyzed at each level. We conclude that a grounded perspective on irrational beliefs increases the explanatory power of the REBT theory of emotions.

Keywords: grounded cognition, irrational beliefs, Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, cognitive restructuring

Knowledge is essential for the existence of all living beings; it gives them past and future, the chance of intelligent behavior and coordinated responses to the environment. Various models and perspectives have been developed regarding the role of knowledge in determining human responses. Moreover, knowledge is profoundly involved in human psychological dysfunctions. The field of cognitive clinical sciences is focused on types of knowledge and knowledge processes that promote psychological disturbance. Various psychological therapies, such as cognitive oriented therapies, have been developed around the idea of modifying specific types of knowledge and cognitive processes or cognitive vulnerabilities that promote psychological disturbance.

The oldest form of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) assumes that specific types of maladaptive knowledge (i.e., irrational beliefs) are the core cognitive vulnerably for emotional disorders. There are four types of irrational beliefs, as described in REBT (Ellis, 1994): demandingness (DEM), awfulizing/catastrophizing (AWF), low frustration tolerance (LFT) and global evaluation of human worth or self-downing (SD). The cornerstone of REBT is the "ABCDE" model (Ellis, 1994). According to the "ABCDE" model, people experience adversities (A), about which they have rational and irrational beliefs (B). These beliefs lead to emotional, behavioral and cognitive consequences (C). Rational beliefs (RBs) lead to functional consequences, while irrational beliefs (IBs) lead to dysfunctional consequences. Clients are encouraged to actively dispute (D) their IBs and to assimilate more efficient (E), adaptive and rational beliefs, with a positive impact on their emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses (Ellis, 1994).

Recently theory and research in REBT addressed the organization of irrational beliefs, mainly in terms of propositions (Ellis, 1994; Dryden, 1984; Wessler & Wessler, 1980) or in terms of schemata (DiGiuseppe, 1996; Nielsen, 2003; Szentagotai, Schnur, DiGiuseppe, Macavei, Kallay, & David, 2005). Schemata and propositions are essential concepts of the symbolic approach in cognitive psychology (Eysenk & Keane, 2000). The propositional and schematic views of irrational beliefs are both based on the assumption of irrational beliefs as amodal symbolic representations. According to this view, information in the physical world produces neural states in the perceptual system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Grounded Cognition Perspective on Irrational Beliefs in Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.