Fiscal Decentralization and the Quality of Public Services in Russian Regions

By Freinkman, Lev | Public Finance and Management, January 1, 2010 | Go to article overview

Fiscal Decentralization and the Quality of Public Services in Russian Regions


Freinkman, Lev, Public Finance and Management


ABSTRACT

The paper provides empirical analysis of the relationship between fiscal decentralization and the quality of public services in the Russian regions. The analysis suggests that fiscal decentralization has no significant effect on the key inputs into secondary education, such as schools, computers, or availability of preschooling, but has a significant positive effect on average examination results, controlling for the key observable inputs and regional government spending on education. Decentralization also has a positive impact on the quality of municipal utilities provision. Both effects can be attributed to strengthened fiscal incentives rather than to superior productive efficiency of municipal governments.

1. INTRODUCTION

Empirical evidence in support of the theoretical advantages of decentralization has been generally in-conclusive, as highlighted by Treisman (2007). This may be partly explained by the difficulties of measuring the extent of decentralization or its relevant aspects such as the degree of voter accountability or decision making autonomy (Treisman, 2002; Stegarescu, 2005). In fact, correlation between different measures of decentralization proves to be astonishingly low (Voigt and Blume, 2008).

Inconclusive empirical evidence may also reflect theoretical ambiguities of the impact of decentraliza-tion. There has been growing consensus in the literature that the results of decentralization depend critically on the local conditions, in particular on comparative inten-sity of distortions in the incentive structure at different tiers of government (Bardhan and Mookherjee, 2005; Blanchard and Shleifer, 2001). The extent of capture at different levels of government, and hence the potential benefits of decentralization, may accordingly depend on the quality of institutions and a number of other factors, including the extent of political centralization, i.e. pres-ence of strong nation-wide parties (Enikolopov and Zhuravskaya, 2007)

Finally, measuring performance under decentra-lization is itself a significant challenge, since the quality of public services tends to be benchmarked through ob-servable input indicators or process-oriented measures, such as pupil enrolment ratios, student-teacher ratios, or teacher absenteeism in education, rather than output in-dicators (such as quality of instruction), which is often much more difficult to assess.

In the light of these complications, more empiri-cal analysis is needed to strengthen the case for further decentralization. Of particular interest would be a direct comparative study of the quality of public service deli-very in more and less decentralized regions, to comple-ment cross-country studies of decentralization and stu-dies of the impact of country-wide reforms. Cross-country studies, for instance those based on perfor-mance in standardized PISA examinations conducted by the OECD (Programme for International Student As-sessment), face the difficulty of meaningfully compar-ing outcome or input indicators across countries given vast differences in objectives, priorities, curricula, and sampling. In addition, production functions that trans-form various inputs in public service provision into out-puts may differ substantially across countries complicat-ing estimation and interpretation (see Nabeshima (2003) on education in South-East Asia). In the case of studies of system-wide reform initiatives, it is often difficult to credibly establish a counterfactual, i.e. the quality of public services in the absence of reforms.

Cross-regional studies, by contrast, combine reasonably comparable data on inputs and outcomes with substantial heterogeneity in some institutional ar-rangements, including the extent of fiscal decentraliza-tion-the role of municipal governments in public ser-vice provision relative to that of central regional gov-ernments. The latter approach was adopted by Galiani and Schargrodsky (2002) and Barankay and Lockwood (2007), and is followed below. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Fiscal Decentralization and the Quality of Public Services in Russian Regions
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.