Analysis of Refereed AEJMC Convention Paper Productivity in Journalism and Mass Communication

By Musambira, George W.; Nesta, Christen | Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, Spring 2010 | Go to article overview

Analysis of Refereed AEJMC Convention Paper Productivity in Journalism and Mass Communication


Musambira, George W., Nesta, Christen, Journalism & Mass Communication Educator


This study analyzed all Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication refereed convention papers from 1999 to 2008 with regard to author names and author institutional affiliations, in order to rank by productivity individual scholars and institutions globally. All refereed papers sponsored by twenty-seven AEJMC organizational units were examined by author name and affiliation to establish institutional productivity patterns and rankings based on the Carnegie Classification system, and individual productivity rankings per organizational unit. The link between top paper productivity and refereed regular paper productivity was assessed with regard to AEJMC organizational units. While top paper institutional productivity was substantially correlated with institutional refereed regular paper productivity, this was not the case for individual paper productivity. Findings are potentially useful for students, educators, and administrators by filling a void in the literature on leading institutions and individuals across specialties of journalism and mass communication represented in AEJMC.

One common academic ritual is participation in annual conferences or conventions. Regardless of whether these meetings are held regionally, nationally, or internationally, the presentation and discussion of blindly refereed papers is one of the major communication activities in which participants engage. This study utilizes top convention papers to identify leading schools and scholars in journalism and mass communication based on a multiplicity of specialties. Although the study focuses on research productivity, it is also relevant to teaching because the information it provides can be used in foundational classes that introduce students to the norms of research in the field. The institutional rankings in each specialty can provide some guidance to students, educators, and researchers as they select the programs to join based on quality and emphasis.

The study is organized in four sections. First, the research emphasizing top convention papers as a measure of research productivity in communication studies and then journalism and mass communication is reviewed. Second, the methods used in the present study are described. Third, results from the study are presented. Finally, a discussion of the results and areas of future research are emphasized.

Review of Literature

Top Convention Paper as Unit of Research Productivity in Communication Studies. For nearly three decades now, scholars have been paying increasing attention to the patterns of research productivity in communication studies1 with emphasis on units of productivity such as articles, books, book chapters, and citations.2 What is surprising is the paucity of research on top convention papers as a measure of productivity. An exception to this tendency is research3 that has posited the value of top convention papers by noting that these papers "might allow judgments of both [research productivity] quality and quantity." Echoing this justification for analyzing top convention papers as a unit of research productivity, one scholar4 averred that a top (award-winning) convention paper would carry more weight than a regular refereed or contributed paper in tenure and promotion deliberations, and "schools are also likely to use such top convention papers won by their faculty and students for purposes of publicity and recruiting." Indeed, because top convention papers are chosen via a blind review system, they are potentially a more objective indicator of an academic program's productivity or a scholar's performance than a reputational study based on self-report questionnaires or peer ratings such as those in common use.5 This does not mean, however, that the selection process of top convention papers (let alone any refereed convention paper) is without fault. For example, although refereed convention papers are reviewed blindly, this process is not as rigorous as the review of journal articles, which is normally conducted by editorial board members of disciplinary repute. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Analysis of Refereed AEJMC Convention Paper Productivity in Journalism and Mass Communication
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.