The European Court of Human Rights' Lautsi Decision: Context, Contents, Consequences

By Andreescu, Gabriel; Andreescu, Liviu | Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, Summer 2010 | Go to article overview

The European Court of Human Rights' Lautsi Decision: Context, Contents, Consequences


Andreescu, Gabriel, Andreescu, Liviu, Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies


Abstract: The paper discusses the context, substance and likely implications of the European Court of Human Rights' very recent but, in our view, historic decision in the case of Lautsi v. Italy. The article offers an outline of the case and of the decision's motivation, a presentation of the responses, and a brief discussion of its relevance to the similar Romanian case. We examine in some detail the objections leveled against the ruling, track the progress of the Court's relevant jurisprudence on the issue, and suggest some possible consequences.

Key Words: freedom of religion, religious manifestations, religious displays, crucifixes, public schools, European Court of Human Rights, rights of the child, margin of appreciation, subsidiarity

Introduction

The European Court of Human Rights' November 2009 decision in the case of Lautsi v. Italy was bold in more than one way. In declaring the presence of crucifixes in compulsory state schools at odds with the European Convention on Human Rights, the Strasbourg Court confronted the sensibilities of many Europeans. The often virulent reaction of politicians and officials all over Europe could have been anticipated from earlier national experiences, such as, for instance, the responses of German politicians and officials to a somewhat similar 1995 decision by the German Constitutional Court. More importantly, the European Court made a bold step towards meeting head-on the implications of its former rulings in religious freedom cases, and in religious display cases particularly. After all, a respected legal scholar had just scolded the Court, no earlier than in 2009, of superficiality: "So far, referring to the national margin of appreciation is the only answer that the European Court of Human Rights has been giving when the issue of banning religious symbols from the public space is at stake."1

In this paper, we aim to describe the context, substance and likely implications of the historic Lautsi decision. In the first section we provide an outline of the case and of the European Court of Human Rights' judgment. This is followed by a presentation of the responses to the ruling throughout Europe. We then briefly inspect similar decisions in Germany and Romania, as well as a number of arguments raised against the Lautsi decision. Finally, we examine in additional detail the progress of the Court's case law towards the decision that is the subject of this article, and eventually offer our views as to its future implications.

The Lautsi case and judgment

In 2002 Soile Lautsi, a Finnish-born Italian member of the Italian Union of Atheists, complained to the board of the school attended by her two children that the presence of a crucifix on the walls of every classroom was contrary to the principle of secularism, in which she believed and which she wished to pass on to her children. In Italy, classroom crucifixes are mandatory under two 1920s laws, though since Catholicism ceased to be a state religion the laws have not been systematically enforced. In May 2002, the school board decided to leave the crucifixes in place, and a directive to that effect by the Ministry of Education was dispatched to head teachers.2 Mrs. Lautsi complained to the Veneto Regional Administrative Court the following month, claiming that the school board's decision conflicted with the principles of secularism and state neutrality enshrined in the constitution. In January 2004 the Administrative Court granted Mrs. Lautsi's request that the case be submitted before the Constitutional Court, which in December disclaimed jurisdiction, motivating that the disputed provisions were statutory rather than legislative.3

Thereupon the case was returned to the administrative court, which ruled against the applicant. The Regional Administrative Court held that the crucifix was a symbol of Italian history and culture and of the principles of equality, liberty and tolerance, and thus also of state secularism. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The European Court of Human Rights' Lautsi Decision: Context, Contents, Consequences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.