Judicial Review of Environmental Administrative Decisions: Has It Changed the Behavior of Government Agencies?

By Zhang, Xuehua; Ortolano, Leonard | The China Journal, July 2010 | Go to article overview

Judicial Review of Environmental Administrative Decisions: Has It Changed the Behavior of Government Agencies?


Zhang, Xuehua, Ortolano, Leonard, The China Journal


(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)

The promulgation of the Administrative Litigation Law (ALL) in 1989 was widely hailed as an historical milestone in China's legal development.1 The law's primary intent is to empower citizens to curb administrative misconduct by government. This is consistent with enhancing the rule of law, the essence of which is described by Randall Peerenboom as placing meaningful constraints on government agencies and individual officials.2

In the late 1980s, early drafts of the ALL faced substantial bureaucratic opposition.3 Agencies were so concerned about the possibility that their decisions would be challenged by ordinary citizens and reviewed by courts that the central government delayed the ALL' s implementation date so that top officials could build support for the law among agencies and give them time to prepare.4 A senior judge on the Hubei Provincial Court said, "Many agency leaders were so afraid of being sued in court that they could not even get to sleep at night". After nearly 20 years of implementation, we ask whether and how the ALL has achieved its goal of restraining administrative behavior.

Empirical studies of the ALL have focused on the processes and outcomes of administrative litigation cases (ALCs) filed by citizens and organizations. These studies identify the tactics employed by litigants and comment on the significance of the ALL in the broader context of state-society relations.5 Among the studies that have considered its overall effects, some conclude that the ALL has made administrative organs more careful about exercising their powers according to the law.6 Others, however, characterize the ALL as a "frail weapon" that has not significantly reduced the arbitrary nature of administrative behavior.7

Abigail Jahiel's work is one of the few environmentally-related studies touching on empirical investigations of the specific effects of ALCs on bureaucratic behavior. Jahiel argues: "... the fact that the EPB [Environmental Protection Bureau] has been put on the offensive ... is responsible for the institutionalization of environmental law enforcement ... In Wuhan, challenges brought against EPB rulings have led to greater efforts on the part of EPB officials to abide strictly by the law."8

Most research on the impact of ALCs on bureaucratic behavior has relied either on survey questionnaires9 or interviews with administrative officials or judges.10 Our study examines comprehensive court case files and uses in-depth interviews with all parties involved in ALCs. " This method enables us to identify variations in the effects of individual ALCs on administrative behavior, and to isolate the factors that might explain such variations. We address these unexamined issues in the context of environmental protection.

We analyze 14 ALCs filed in two counties in Hubei Province to explore the effects of individual ALCs on EPBs and to identify the factors explaining differences in those effects. Given the relatively small number of lawsuits investigated in this paper, the findings cannot be considered as representative; rather, they illustrate the spectrum of specific effects of individual ALCs and provide a basis for hypotheses that can be tested with a larger sample in future research.

Our analysis shows that half of the 14 ALCs led to changes in EPB behavior and procedures. The changes occurred only in cases in which (i) the officials in charge of adrriinistrative enforcement had knowledge of legal issues, and (ii) those officials agreed with the courts' judgements regarding legal deficiencies in EPB practices. In cases where these two conditions were not met, either ALCs had no effect on EPB practices or the ALC outcomes caused the EPBs to modify their enforcement strategies to avoid future litigation without correcting legal errors identified during litigation.

In examining whether and how ALCs placed achninistrative behavior under the supervision of the courts and citizens, we found the record to be mixed. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Judicial Review of Environmental Administrative Decisions: Has It Changed the Behavior of Government Agencies?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.