Reminiscences of JUSTICE STEVENS by His Law Clerks

Judicature, July/August 2010 | Go to article overview

Reminiscences of JUSTICE STEVENS by His Law Clerks

Three memorable opinions

by Carole Lee

My coclerk Jeff Lehman and I felt that we had the best clerkship in the building. We were the ones who worked for Justice Stevens, whom we and all the other clerks admired greatly for his intellect and his lawyerly, intellectually honest approach to the law. Since there were just two of ing it was a chambers meeting every time the Justire came into our office. sat down in lite sagging black leather armchair by the door, and started to talk. We didn't have to write bench memos. We weren't pan of the cert pool, so we didn't have to write cert memos aboiu petitions that weren't going to be discussed at conference. We had the privilege of working with an incredibly smart, thoughtful Justice with an interesting mind and a remarkable memory.

Justice Sievcns wrote his own opinions in his own distinctive voice. The 1982 Term opinions that I find most memorable are two concurrences and an opinion respecting ihe denial of certiorari. Karcher. Daggett was a challenge to the bizarrely-shaped congressional districting map created by the New Jersey legislature on a straight parry-line vole. In his concurring opinion. Justice Stevens restated his view that egregious political gerrymandering is unconstitutional because the Equal Protection Clause prohibits discrimination against political groups.

One of the districts, including parts of seven counties, was shaped like a swan with appendages stretching into distant parts of the slate. Another district along the coast was contiguous only for vachtsmen. To show how far the districis departed from compactness and ronliguily. Justice Stevens decided that a color map should be included in the U.S. Reports. The chief juslice objected that it would be too expensive. Justice Stevens responded that the extra printing cost was less than the amount that he saved the Court by having only two law clerks.

Another memorable opinion was Justice Stevens' concurrence in EEOC. v. Warnung.- The state asserted that the Tenth Amendment. as interpreted in National league of Cities v. Usery,3 precluded the application of the federal age discrimination statute to slate fish and game wardens. Justice Brennan was able to assemble a majority that rejected the state's position on the basis that National League of Cities was distinguishable on the facts. Although the Justice joined the majority, his concurrence took a bolder position on the law. He declared that National League of Cities, was so plainly incorrect that, stetre decisis a notwithstanding, "the law would be well served by a prompt rejenion of [its] modem embodiment of the spirit of the Articles of Confederation."

He explained his position in sweeping historical terms; the Commerce Clause "was the Framers' response to the central problem that gave rise to the Constitution itself." Over the course of history, the Court had occasionally given a "miserly construction" to the Commerce Clause, but it had later repudiated those cases to allow federal regulation of an expanding national economy. Justice Stevens added that he thought that the benefits of a mandatory retirement age exceeded the burdens, but that his personal views on such matters were totally irrelevant to his judicial task. This combination of boldness and restraint was quintessential Justice Stevens. Several years later, National I. eagiie of Citifs was overruled.1

Finally, a non-standard writing by the Justice that term had a salii tan1 effect on the course of the law. In McCmy v. Nnv York, the prosecution had exercised peremptory challenges to remove all blacks from juries that convicted black defendants. Justices Marshall and Brennan dissented from the denial of certiorari. declaring that the Court should reexamine its 1965 decision in Swain v. Alabama,'' which placed a nearly insurmountable burden of proof on defendants seeking a remedy for racially motivated peremptory challenges. In response, Justice Stevens wrote an "opinion respecting the denial of remoran,"'* in which he acknowledged the importance of the underlying issue but stated that "further consideration of the substantive and procedural ramifications of the problem by other courts will enable us to deal with the issue more wiselv at a later date. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Reminiscences of JUSTICE STEVENS by His Law Clerks


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.