Professing Political Theory

By Gunnell, John G. | Political Research Quarterly, September 2010 | Go to article overview

Professing Political Theory


Gunnell, John G., Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

Political theorists cannot reasonably maintain an institutional attachment to the discipline of political science and claim a place in the curriculum of the field while professing intellectual autonomy. Political theory is the progeny of American political science, as well as a subfield of the discipline, and it is important to dispel mythologies of political theory as a separate world-historical endeavor. Political theorists, like all social scientists, must realistically come to grips with their cognitive and practical relationship to their subject matter and resist the forms of dislocated rhetoric that sustain their often anomalous condition.

Keywords

political theory, political science, profession, politics, moralism, scientism

My view of both the history and contemporary condition of academic political theory in the United States coincides very closely with that presented by Timothy Kaufman-Osborn in "Political Theory as Profession and as Subfield," and in several respects, my comments are intended as an annotation of his article. This is not to suggest, however, that the implications that I draw from his analysis necessarily coincide with his assessment of the proper role for political theory. While many political scientists and political theorists are quite content with the growing distance between political theory and political science, my argument is unequivocally for integration or at least greater complementarity (Gunnell 2006). Although this might seem to ally me with the spirit of the Foundations of Political Theory letter to the Department of Political Science at Pennsylvania State University, I have serious reservations about both the content and purpose of that letter.

Timothy's account of the dilemma of political theory indicates that part of the difficulty in addressing issues revolving around the "profession" of political theory arises from a paradox. While political theory is a highly pluralistic field and tends to lack even the limited sense of identity that adheres to other subfields of political science, it often seeks to claim a distinct intellectual character as a basis for establishing its independence from the discipline of political science to which it remains institutionally attached. This has led, as Timothy suggests, to the evolution of an imagined community of political theory. To understand this situation, there is a need to recognize and reconcile two quite different senses of "profession"1 that have been entangled in this discourse. The genealogy of political theory as an occupation and form of professional academic employment has, from the beginning, been surrounded with a mythology of political theory as a world-historical calling devoted to the public profession of faith, belief, and opinion.

Although during the past half century the mythology of political theory has often been designed to vouchsafe its autonomy as an interdisciplinary, humanistically oriented practice, which can be distinguished from the scientific pretensions of mainstream political science, its various contemporary varieties are the progeny of political science. This subfield originated in the mid-nineteenth century, within the emerging discipline of political science, as an elaborate historico-philosophical narrative of the development of Western political thought. This narrative served to provide an ancestry and provenance both for American democratic political institutions and for the discipline of political science and its Teutonic theory of the state. In this story, it was not only political theory that took on a transcendental status but politics itself, which was conceived as substantially more universal, profound, and noble than its putative manifestations in conventional political practices. This narrative functioned, within the academy, to distinguish political science from other fields of social science, but it also was intended to validate the cognitive authority of the discipline with respect to its right and capacity to profess about matters of civic education and public policy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Professing Political Theory
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.