Court Responses to Batterer Program Noncompliance: A National Survey

By Labriola, Melissa; O'Sullivan, Chris et al. | Judicature, September/October 2010 | Go to article overview

Court Responses to Batterer Program Noncompliance: A National Survey


Labriola, Melissa, O'Sullivan, Chris, Frank, Phyllis B., Rempel, Michael, Judicature


Over the past 25 years, the criminal justice system has sought to transform its historically inadequate response to domestic violence. The resulting pro-arrest and prosecution policies precipitated a massive influx of domestic violence cases into criminal courts nationwide. Increasingly, courts have turned to batterer programs as the preferred sentence in these cases, especially when the legal issues precluded a jail sentence.

For many years, the most widely understood purpose of court orders to batterer programs was to induce participants to stop their abusive behavior. Recently, however, the proposition that these programs can prevent further violence has emerged as a matter of contention. Although more than 65 batterer program studies have been completed since the 1980s, only five have employed experimental designs, providing the most robust test of effectiveness through random assignment to a batterer program or a control condition. The results of these experiments suggest that batterer programs may not be effective in reducing re-abuse.

Only the first experimental test found a clear positive effect on rates of re-abuse.1 Of the four more recent experiments, three showed no beneficial effect of a court order to a batterer program- and one showed a small suppressive effect on re-abuse only while the offenders were actively enrolled in the program/ A meta-analytic review of the experiments as well as several quasi-experiments with matched control groups found, on average, that batterer programs do not reduce re-offending, especially when measured by victim report, or at best show only marginal advantages over alternative sanctions such as probation, community service, or court monitoring/ Although even the strongest of the experimental studies have serious design limitations6 the preponderance of the strongest available evidence is not encouraging.

Given the questionable capacity of batterer programs to reduce reoffending, another potential function, promoted for years by some advocates and gaining broader attention in the wake of the aforementioned research, is accountability. This function is consistent with the original description of batterer programs in the late 1970s as one component of a broader criminal justice response. The Domestic Abuse Intervention Project in Duluth, Minnesota, creators of the popular "Duluth Model" for batterer programs, describe the model as a "coordinated community response" guided by the aim of "changing the climate of tolerance for [domestic] violence."6

Yet, although "accountability" is linked rhetorically with batterer programs and the court response to domestic violence, the term has rarely been defined nor have the implications for court policies and practice been analyzed. In the study reported here, the underlying assumption was that to hold domestic violence offenders accountable, criminal courts must not merely order them to batterer programs but must enforce those orders by imposing meaningful consequences for noncompliance. When courts consistently impose penalties in response to noncompliance, up to and including jail, they send a clear message to the offender and to the greater community that the criminal justice system takes the offense (and its own orders) seriously. Our study investigated the extent to which criminal courts currently implement this principle of accountability in their everyday practice.

Questions and methodology

Our primary research question was simple: To what extent do criminal courts across the country impose further penalties on domestic violence offenders who fail to comply with a court order to a batterer program? A corollary question was: What goals do courts, batterer programs, and battered women's agencies ascribe to court orders to batterer programs? Additional questions were: When and how do courts order offenders to these programs and what other types of programs do courts order for domestic violence offenders? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Court Responses to Batterer Program Noncompliance: A National Survey
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.