A National Assessment of Public Defender Office Caseloads

By Farole, Donald J.; Langton, Lynn | Judicature, September/October 2010 | Go to article overview

A National Assessment of Public Defender Office Caseloads


Farole, Donald J., Langton, Lynn, Judicature


Nearly 50 years after the United States Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwnght1 that states were required to ensure a constitutional right to counsel for defendants unable to afford a private attorney, it is widely recognized that indigent defense systems are in a state of crisis. Many have long argued that because of underfunding and understaffing, a lack of political independence to turn down cases, and other factors, public defenders face caseloads so excessive that they are unable to provide capable and effective representation.2 There have been a number of recent cases in which public defenders have gone before the courts to refuse cases due to overload or sued over excessive caseloads. In some instances, courts have cited defenders for contempt for refusing to accept new cases. Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, and New York are among the states in which public defenders have taken legal action to contend that caseloads are unreasonably large given the offices' budgets and staffing,3

Professional rules of conduct require that an attorney's caseload and workload be controlled to ensure that competent representation can be provided.1 It is generally agreed that workload, a measure that takes into account case complexity, nonrepresentation dudes, and other factors, is a more accurate indicator of a public defender's capacity to provide competent representation than a simple caseload tally/ What constitutes an exessive workload, and how to measure it, however, is still subject to debate. That said, a national numeric caseload standard has existed since 1973, when the U.S. Department of Justice's National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (NAC) released recommendations for the improvement of the justice system. The NAC standard provides that a public defender caseload should not exceed, per year, 1 50 felony, 400 misdemeanor, 200 juvenile, 200 mental health, or 25 appeals cases per attorney.11

Numerous studies have examined workloads or caseloads in individual states and jurisdictions, but no systematic assessment of public defender office caseloads and staffing nationwide has been conducted. To better understand caseload burdens on public defenders from a truly national perspective, we examine findings from the first census of public defender offices. The Bureau of Justice Statistics' 2007 Census of Public Defender Offices (CPDO) collected data on the caseloads and staffing of public defender offices across the country that provide general criminal defense services. (Note that the CPDO did not collect data about other methods of providing indigent defense services, such as assigned counsel or contract systems.) The analysis relies on data from about 960 public defender offices in 49 states and the District of Columbia.

The analysis distinguishes statebased from county-based public defender systems. In 2007, 22 states had one office that oversaw indigent defense operations throughout the state. The remaining 27 states and the District of Columbia had offices that were funded and administered at the county or local jurisdictional level.7 (Maine had no public defender offices in 2007.) State oversight potentially allows for a more appropriate distribution of resources across the state. For example, state public defender programs could transfer staff and other resources from one office to another should the need arise, an option unavailable in states with county-based systems. In other words, these systems operate differently from one another in ways that are directly relevant to the caseloads carried by public defenders. Due to these differences, we examine state- and county-based systems separately.

Caseloads and staffing

The CPDO collected information from 957 public defender offices nationwide. These offices reported receiving a total 5,572,450 cases and employed 15,026 litigating attorneys in 2007.R This equates, nationally, to about 370 cases assigned to each public defender in 2007 (not included are cases assigned in previous years that remained active in 2007). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A National Assessment of Public Defender Office Caseloads
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.