Experiences of Family Law Attorneys with Current Issues in Divorce Practice

By Braver, Sanford L.; Cookston, Jeffrey T. et al. | Family Relations, October 2002 | Go to article overview

Experiences of Family Law Attorneys with Current Issues in Divorce Practice


Braver, Sanford L., Cookston, Jeffrey T., Cohen, Bruce R., Family Relations


Experiences of Family Law Attorneys With Current Issues in Divorce Practice*

A survey was administered at a state bar convention to 72 family law attorneys who reported on their experiences in representing a total of 3,860 clients. Results showed that lawyers believed that (a) most losers in relocation cases do not or would not ultimately move; (b) the Family Court Masters system seems to be helpful to families; (c) lawyers' actions often raise the emotional level of the dispute; and (d) the divorce and custody system is biased against fathers.

Key Words: attorneys, divorce, family, law, relocation.

There is a strong impetus in the United States to view family relationships as an entirely private matter, something the family members work out largely by themselves without outside intervention unless they seek it. On the other hand, many aspects of family relations are governed by legal restrictions, policies, and procedures.

Because the state is seen to have a valid interest in certain family matters, in many respects it restricts how family members may act toward one another. Such restrictions are especially obvious in the instance of family dissolution and divorce. Because divorce (like marriage) is a legal and familial event, it must be sanctioned by the law and the courts to be valid. For the most part, and based on the U.S. Constitution and interpretations thereof by courts, laws concerning families apply at the state level, as opposed to lower levels of jurisdiction, such as the county, or the higher federal level.

Nonetheless, the federal government has immense influence on state-level family policy because of enormous financial incentives. For example, the child support policy in each state is greatly affected by the opportunity of the state to receive Federal Child Support Enforcement funding, but only if it hones its laws to complement federal "guidelines." As a result, virtually all states have similar child support policies, such as the use of "presumptive guidelines." Moreover, laws concerning families are virtually always adjudicated and enforced at the county level via county superior courts. Therefore the practices and procedures are likely to be in effect countywide. Despite these qualifications, the major difference in law occurs at the statewide level, and there are substantial variations across states in their laws concerning the matters addressed by the survey administered in this study.

Thus, many state statutes, policies, and procedures constrain the actions of the two divorcing parties. States' constraints are maximal when there are contested matters that the parties have not been able to resolve themselves, and they submit these issues and themselves to the court to decide or adjudicate. However, it is surprising to many that the incidence of this happening actually is small. Braver and O'Connell (1998) report that only 5% of the more than 300 cases they examined required judicial rendering of decisions, whereas Maccoby and Mnookin (1992) reported a figure of 1.5% based on 1,100 cases.

It might appear that the law's constraint would not be substantial in the remaining cases, in which the two parties agree on all of the various matters they must settle when the decision is made to legally terminate their marriage. In the case of such full agreement between the parties on these matters, "private ordering" (Mnookin, 1985) dictates the settlement of their affairs, and they merely bring their paperwork to a judge who (generally with no questions asked) typically "rubber stamps" their decisions, making them legally binding. (In the case of these "agreed-upon" settlements, it may not be a judge, but a commissioner, hearing officer, or even a clerk who stamps their agreements with the seal of the court.) However, even in settled cases, the backdrop of the court and the formal setting has considerable influence on the family. What Erlanger, Chambliss, and Melli (1987) term the informal processes of bargaining and negotiation occur "in the shadow of the law" (Mnookin & Kornhauser, 1979. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Experiences of Family Law Attorneys with Current Issues in Divorce Practice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.