Romney V. Lin: ERISA Preemption of Section 630 of New York's Business Corporation Law

By Susac, Heather M. | St. John's Law Review, Summer 1997 | Go to article overview

Romney V. Lin: ERISA Preemption of Section 630 of New York's Business Corporation Law


Susac, Heather M., St. John's Law Review


In 1974, Congress enacted the Employment Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA")1 to establish a national uniform system of regulating employee benefit plans.2 Widespread abuse by employers of employee benefit plans prompted the need for such regulation.3 By subjecting employers to various and sometimes conflicting regulations, piecemeal regulation of employee benefit plans at the state and federal level proved to be inadequate.4 "In enacting ERISA, Congress was primarily concerned with the mismanagement of funds accumulated to finance employee benefits and the failure to pay employees benefits from accumulated funds."5 In response to these concerns, Congress "established extensive reporting, disclosure, and fiduciary duty requirements to insure against the possibility that the employee's expectation of the benefit would be defeated through poor management by the plan administrator."6

In addition to its regulatory requirements, ERISA contains a comprehensive civil enforcement provision, section 502(a), that allows a plan participant or beneficiary to bring a civil action to recover benefits due, to enforce existing rights, or to clarify rights to future benefits.7 Moreover, to facilitate uniform administration of the law, Congress included a broad preemption provision to "allow a single set of regulations to govern the administration of benefit plans."8 Section 514(a) of ERISA states that, unless specifically exempt,9 ERISA "supersede[s] any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to an employee benefit plan." lo Today, ERISA preemption is one of the most frequently litigated issues under the statute and has resulted in the preemption of various state statutes and common laws. ll

Recently, in Romney v. Lin,l2 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed the question of whether ERISA preempts section 630 of the New York Business Corporation Law ("BCL").13 Section 630 of the BCL was originally enacted to provide employees with protection in the event of employer insolvency.l" BCL section 630(a) imposes joint and several liability on the ten largest shareholders of a closely-held corporation for specified corporate obligations enumerated in the statute.15 Specifically, the ten largest shareholders are personally liable for "all debts, wages or salaries due and owing to any of its laborers, servants or employees." BCL section 630(b) defines "wages and salaries" to include "employer contributions to or payments of insurance or welfare benefits [and] employer contributions to pension or annuity funds ...Significantly, as it applies to pension plans, the statute imposes liability on shareholders only after the corporate entity fails to satisfy a judgment for delinquent contributions.le After obtaining a judgment against a corporation for failure to make contributions to an employee pension plan, BCL section 630 allows a plan fiduciary or participant to enforce the un-executed judgment against the corporation's ten largest shareholders.l9

In Romney,20 the Second Circuit held that ERISA preempts BCL section 630. 21 In this case, the plaintiff-employee (the "Union") obtained an arbitration award against a closely-held New York corporation ("Goodee Fashions") for failure to make required contributions to four union benefit funds.22 The Supreme Court of New York County confirmed the award and issued a judgment.23 After an unsuccessful attempt to enforce the judgment against the corporation, the Union sued the principal shareholder ("Lin") of Goodee Fashions under BCL section 630 to enforce the judgment.24 Lin removed the action to federal court,25 and the district court dismissed the claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.zs The Union's motion to remand was denied, and the Union appealed to the Second Circuit arguing that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the state law claim.27

The Second Circuit prefaced its ruling on the jurisdiction and removal issues with a discussion of the doctrine of complete preemption. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Romney V. Lin: ERISA Preemption of Section 630 of New York's Business Corporation Law
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.