"We Can Work It Out"1: Using Cooperative Mediation - a Blend of Collaborative Law and Traditional Mediation - to Resolve Divorce Disputes

By Langan, Elena B. | The Review of Litigation, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview

"We Can Work It Out"1: Using Cooperative Mediation - a Blend of Collaborative Law and Traditional Mediation - to Resolve Divorce Disputes


Langan, Elena B., The Review of Litigation


I. INTRODUCTION

Divorce in modern day America is a product of legislative creation,3 designed as an adversarial process focused on rights and responsibilities. Authority to break marital bonds is vested in courts; in the past forty years, however, reliance on judicial determination of the rights and obligations that accrue upon divorce has diminished in favor of private ordering,4 often achieved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms.

Most experts agree that courts are ill-equipped to handle interdisciplinary issues present in divorce cases.5 Courts can address legal issues that arise when a marriage is terminated, but are unable to also ameliorate the psychological and emotional fallout.6 Litigantspecific results that fit particular family situations are often unavailable because statutory restrictions on judicial authority are imposed.7 Judicial labor is reduced when orders fall within parameters adopted by the legislature that make specific fact-finding unnecessary.8 It is more expethent for judges to follow guidelines that provide a one-size-fits-all solution rather than tailor orders to meet individual family needs. Consequently, easing the trauma suffered by a family falls outside judicial purview.

As a result of perceived inadequacies of the court system in dealing with marital disputes, it is not surprising that practitioners and litigants often turn to extra-judicial methods of resolving divorce cases. Two forms of ADR that have been favored in dissolution of marriage actions are mediation, first introduced as an ADR method in the 1970s,9 and collaborative law, the veritable new kid on the block, developed within the past twenty years.10 Today, proponents of each ADR method vocally extol the perceived benefits.11 Detractors are equally strident in highlighting shortcomings.12

Although the practice of each method has beneficial aspects aimed at reducing the trauma associated with divorce litigation, neither adequately fulfills the needs of litigants and lawyers practicing in the area. Rather than eschewing one method in favor of the other, there is a middle ground that combines favorable features of each ADR paradigm to create a hybrid form of "cooperative mediation." The cooperative mediation process proposed here addresses many of the criticisms leveled against mediation and collaborative law. It helps satisfy the parties' needs for procedural and substantive justice, which litigants often feel is lacking in ADR methods. It does not ignore the adversarial nature of divorce, but still focuses on private ordering as the preferred method for resolving divorce disputes in a cost-effective, extra-judicial manner.

Before examining the benefits and shortcomings of mediation and collaborative law and detailing practice parameters for cooperative mediation, Part II of this paper will discuss the adversarial nature of divorce and its historical underpinnings impacting the effectiveness of ADR methods.13 Part UI identifies, critiques, and compares key process features of mediation and collaborative law. Finally, Part IV will explain the proposed paradigm for cooperative mediation and justification for inclusion of certain process features.

II. DIVORCE IS AN ADVERSARIAL, RIGHTS-BASED PROCESS

The adversarial nature of divorce is implicit in the role that marital fault has historically played in divorce actions. Because changes in social and economic status often occur when property rights are divided and obligations are imposed as a result of divorce, the parties' interests generally conflict.1 When a finite amount of resources are available to a family unit comprised of individual interests that cannot be fully satisfied, competition for limited resources causes the adversarial nature of divorce to continue.

The basic concept of assigning rights and obligations upon divorce dates back to ancient times, during which entitlement was predicated upon freedom from fault for the marital breakdown. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

"We Can Work It Out"1: Using Cooperative Mediation - a Blend of Collaborative Law and Traditional Mediation - to Resolve Divorce Disputes
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.