Masculinity & American Militarism

By Ehrenreich, Nancy | Tikkun, November/December 2002 | Go to article overview

Masculinity & American Militarism


Ehrenreich, Nancy, Tikkun


POLITICS

Commentators discussing the U.S. attack on Afghanistan mention gender primarily as a justification for aggression. One of the benefits, they tell us, of dumping tons of bombs on Afghan targets and installing a pro-U.S. government in the country, is that now Afghan women are free to get schooling, shed their burqas, and walk the streets. But aside from this cynically opportunistic use of women and feminist concerns as an excuse to justify U.S. aggression abroad, there hasn't been much focus on gender in either public or (at least in my experience) private discourse on events since September 11. The silence is surprising, for a close look at American ideas about gender roles-especially ideas about masculinity-reveals that those ideas have supplied important emotional and metaphorical fuel for the government's recent military actions in Afghanistan, and for increased American bellicosity around the world.

Of course the reasons for both the attack and the American response are complex. Many factors have no doubt motivated the United States' actions in Afghanistan, both before and after September 11. Likely suspects include: Cold War thinking-the U.S. tried to "set up" the Russians in Afghanistan, hoping that the region would become "the Russian Vietnam"; oil-the best means of accessing the expansive (and landlocked) Caspian oil reserves is through Afghanistan; and domestic politics-Bush is in bed with both oil and weapons-producing interests, and has clearly needed something to distract the nation's attention from the flagging economy, as well as the Enron fiasco.

Nevertheless, to understand the particular virulence of U.S. reactions to September 11-both at the level of the government and among the general population-we need to understand American norms about masculinity. Under the set of unstated ideas about what makes a "real" man, disproportionate violence is the only viable response to an extreme experience of victimization such as the attack of September 11.

Masculinity and Violence

Masculinity has been defined as the "images, values, interests, and activities held important to a successful achievement of male adulthood in American cultures." It's what "real" men have, and what women and "sissies" lack. It protects boys from getting beaten up, helps men attract women, and proves males' heterosexuality (even when they're gay).

Of course, ideas about masculinity vary from one ethnic group to another, as well as from one institutional context to another. But an idealized American image of masculinity dominates the media, the advertising and film industries, and mainstream American culture in general. And that set of gender-linked behavioral norms is coercive, putting pressure on men to conform just as norms defining femininity coerce women.

To be a "real" man, a male cannot be fearful, indecisive, conciliatory or weak. A boy or man who is not sufficiently masculine will be stigmatized as a sissy, ostracized as a "mama's boy," or stereotyped as gay. These gendered tropes associate weakness and victimization with both femaleness and inadequate masculinity, conveying the message that a male victim of violence is an inadequate man. Unless, of course, he responds in kind. In fact, the rhetoric of highly masculinized activities in this society (including football, the military, and big business) is all about how defeat feminizes and humiliates the defeated-and how it must be revenged by victory. Thus, fear of the feminine, and the related fear of being seen as gay, play a crucial role in enforcing masculine gender norms on men.

According to William Pollack, author of Real Boys (billed as the male analogue to Reviving Ophelia), psychological literature supports this association between masculinity and violence. Fathers often enforce violent gender norms on their sons, he explains, while mothers accede to this "boys don't cry" socialization out of fear that their boys will be stigmatized, ostracized, or even subjected to harassment and physical violence if they don't. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Masculinity & American Militarism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.