A Political History of National Action: Its Fears, Ideas, Tactics and Conflicts

By Whitford, Troy | Rural Society, April 2011 | Go to article overview

A Political History of National Action: Its Fears, Ideas, Tactics and Conflicts


Whitford, Troy, Rural Society


ABSTRACT

Nation Action began in 1982 as a student-based radical nationalist group opposed to increased Asian immigration and multiculturalism in Australia. Adopting early to mid 20th century labourist policies, and blending them with traditional Australian radical nationalism, the group aimed to increase its appeal and membership through militant propaganda campaigns. However, its authoritarian structure and tactics fractured the group internally and prompted opponents to describe it as a neo-Nazi organisation. Such labelling served only to enhance its appeal to people who espoused white supremacist beliefs and were prepared to engage in increasingly violent behaviour. This examination of National Action suggests that the group was unable to develop either an effective organisational structure or a relevant set of ideas and objectives that could win it the broad popular support it sought. While aiming to rise above student-based politics, National Action never realised this goal and subsequently declined into obscurity.

Keywords: structure, behaviour, National Action, campaigns, beliefs

INTRODUCTION

In 1982 the radical nationalist group, National Action, emerged on university campuses in Sydney, mimicking the organisational structures of extreme leftist student organisations. Its tactics were reminiscent of those adopted by a variety of Maoist and Trotskyist groups active across universities during the 1970s. National Action primarily targeted Asian immigration. It adopted a radical stance with labourist rhetoric and policies akin to those of the first half of the 20th century. National Action also invoked elements of Australia's radical nationalist history, drawing on the ideas of William Lane and P.R. Stephensen, couched in the political rhetoric of Jack Lang. Its emblem was the Eureka flag.

The appropriation of these ideas and their marriage to increasingly extreme political action put the group out of step with mainstream Labor Party policies and alienated potential conservative supporters. Moreover, internal debates about the nature and direction of the group fractured the organisation internally, attracting a membership of disaffected people espousing neo-Nazi and white supremacist beliefs. Some members were ready to undertake criminal activities in support of their interpretation of the group's objectives. This brought National Action into conflict with media, politicians and law enforcement agencies.

An ill-defined set of objectives, a tendency to extremism, and an ostensibly authoritarian leadership unable to discipline its membership were factors which led to the collapse of National Action. In many respects the history of National Action (albeit short) tells the story of a nationalist student group declining into a rabble without a cause.

METHODOLOGY

National Action has been virtually ignored by historians and political scholars. Perhaps this is because of its relatively contemporaneous nature and the ephemeral character of sources generated by the organisation. But there also is a deeply ingrained orthodoxy surrounding the treatment of right wing extremist groups like National Action. A leading scholar in the field, Andrew Moore, unwittingly sums up the orthodoxy when he writes that 'the purpose of studying the history of the Australian Right is to know the enemy' (2005). There is a strong sense in the literature surrounding extreme right wing groups that any analysis of these groups should be accompanied by unequivocal condemnation. Impartial, analytical treatment of extreme right wing groups is consequently viewed as supporting, sympathising, or descending into apologetics. Writing objectively without adhering to the orthodoxy established in the literature incites anger among some readers and complicates publication in the field. Work pertaining specifically to National Action is cursory. Moore in his history of right wing groups, The Right Road? (1995), devotes little specific attention to National Action. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Political History of National Action: Its Fears, Ideas, Tactics and Conflicts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.