The Deuteronomistic Critique of Solomon: A Response to Marvin A. Sweeney

By Glatt-Gilad, David A | Journal of Biblical Literature, Winter 1997 | Go to article overview

The Deuteronomistic Critique of Solomon: A Response to Marvin A. Sweeney


Glatt-Gilad, David A, Journal of Biblical Literature


The portrayal of Solomon in the Deuteronomistic History (DtrH) has occasioned much scholarly attention owing to the tantalizing ambivalence surrounding Solomon's image and the attendant ramifications for the composition of DtrH. In a recent article in this journal, Marvin A. Sweeney has provided a useful outline of the problem, focusing on the apparent discrepancy between Solomon's roles as first heir to the Davidic dynasty, wisest of all kings and founder of the Temple, on the one hand, and a sinner who is held responsible for the division of the united kingdom, on the other hand.1 Before offering his own solution, Sweeney briefly refers to two alternative lines of reasoning on the issue: first, that the dichotomous portrayals of Solomon are to be related to the notion of a double redaction of DtrH; second, that the negative portrayal of Solomon stems from the Deuteronomist's incorporation of northern material following the fall of Samaria. After successfully pointing to the weaknesses of the second approach in particular, Sweeney puts forward his own analysis, namely, that a closer inspection of the Solomon-related material in DtrH reveals signs of an ongoing critique, which purposely presents Solomon "as the foil for Josiah and the antithesis of ideal kingship in the DtrH" (p. 622). Moreover, Sweeney puts his literary analysis within a specific historical context in arguing that the overall critique of Solomon points to a Josianic historiographer who saw "the propagandistic value of condemning Solomon in relation to a policy that was designed to attract the people of the former northern kingdom of Israel back to Davidic rule" (p. 616 n. 33).

In evaluating Sweeney's proposal, it is important to separate its literary and historical aspects. One must first question whether the overall portrayal of Solomon in DtrH can legitimately be read as a veiled critique. As a corollary, one may ask whether the critique, to the extent that it exists, indeed corresponds to the propagandistic purpose Sweeney attributes to it.

On the literary-critical level, Sweeney's analysis represents a departure from those studies which view 1 Kings 11 as standing completely apart from the preceding chapters in its singular criticism of Solomon.2 To the contrary, Sweeney argues that two themesnamely, Solomon's apostasy through foreign marriages and his mistreatment of the northern tribes, the very causes for the breakup of the monarchy according to 1 Kings 11-12-permeate the narrative of 1 Kings 3-10 as well. Sweeney adduces his evidence for the first theme from the scattered notices referring to Pharaoh's daughter (1 Kgs 3:1; 7:8; 9:16, 24) and from the irony inherent in the fact that Jeroboam is given sanctuary by none other than Pharaoh (1 Kgs 11:40). As for Solomon's mistreatment of the northern tribes, Sweeney points to the royal district list in 1 Kgs 4:7-19, the report of a forced levy in 1 Kgs 5:27-32, and Solomon's ceding of twenty Galilean cities to Hiram mentioned in 1 Kgs 9:10-14, all of which appear to discriminate against northern interests.

Methodologically, however, one must question the way in which Sweeney is using the evidence. Can the texts he cites indeed be said to consciously advance a historiographic agenda?3 And, if so, must that agenda necessarily carry negative overtones? Alternatively, might the texts in question, or at least some of them, be better appreciated in terms of their supplying the raw material, however unwittingly, for a modern, historical appreciation of Solomon's kingdom? Regarding these issues, Sweeney fails to distinguish between passages that form part of an editorially conditioned structure and those that do not constitute part of a particular literary patterning. In the first category, one may assign the notices relating to Pharaoh's daughter in 3:1-2(4) and 9:24-25. As noted recently by Marc Brettler, these verses form part of the Deuteronomist's overall literary frame, inasmuch as they define the boundaries of the two opposing portrayals of Solomon in 1 Kings 3-11 (a point we shall return to below). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Deuteronomistic Critique of Solomon: A Response to Marvin A. Sweeney
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.