Feres and the Privacy Act: Are Military Personnel Records Protected?

By Juergens, Eric | St. John's Law Review, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview

Feres and the Privacy Act: Are Military Personnel Records Protected?


Juergens, Eric, St. John's Law Review


INTRODUCTION

A book author is permitted to observe the training of a group of Navy aviators as they learn the intricacies of flying a high-powered fighter jet.1 During this training, one of the pilots, Mary Louise commits serious errors, including aligning her aircraft with the wrong runway and causing another pilot to take evasive action while flying in formation.2 The Navy launches an investigation into whether Mary Louise should continue to fly, producing hearings and documentary evidence, and ultimately, Mary Louise is allowed to keep her position.3 The book this author later releases quotes from the negative reports on Mary Louise that the Navy had permitted him to see.4 Mary Louise sues the Navy for violations of the Privacy Act for releasing her private information without her consent.5 This may seem like a fairly obvious and egregious violation of the Privacy Act, but the inquiry is not nearly that simple. Indeed, she may not even be able to bring the suit because she is a member of the United States Armed Forces.6

The Privacy Act protects individuals from the release of confidential records by the United States government without that person's consent.7 Not everyone, however, is so protected. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Uhl v. Swanstrom barred Privacy Act claims by members of the military,8 while the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Cummings v. Department of the Navy allowed such a claim.9 This Note suggests that, upon close scrutiny, these two seemingly irreconcilable decisions are actually in accord with each other and in harmony with the congressional intent of the Privacy Act.

The United States Armed Forces rely on an all-volunteer force to accomplish the military missions of this nation and protect its citizens from harm at home and abroad.10 The military has long been subject to a system of justice different from that which the general citizens are subject.11 This alternate system of justice governed soldiers during World War I and World War II, even though many of them were drafted into service.12 In response to the astonishing number of courts-martial during World War II, Congress passed the Uniform Code of Military Justice ("UCMJ").13 This legislation, implemented through executive orders, formed the Manual for Courts-Martial ("MCM") and was a major revision of the law governing the military.14 The preamble to the MCM states its objectives: "The purpose of military law is to promote justice, to assist in maintaining good order and discipline in the armed forces, to promote efficiency and effectiveness in the military establishment, and thereby to strengthen the national security of the United States."15 Since the military is governed by this alternate justice system, the question thus arises whether members of the military, or the military branches themselves, are subject to more general civil laws such as the Federal Torts Claim Act ("FTCA"),16 Bivens claims,17 and the Privacy Act.18

Despite the waiver of sovereign immunity in the FTCA, the Supreme Court prohibited members of the military from bringing claims under the FTCA. This bar began in Feres v. United States,19 where, as explored below, the Court held, in a ruling now known as the Feres doctrine, that "the Government is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service."20 After Feres, the Supreme Court extended the Feres doctrine beyond its original scope, and the rationales behind the doctrine evolved. Claims for injuries that "arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service" are prohibited.21 Such a service-related claim must, according to United States v. Johnson, be barred because it "necessarily implicates the military judgments and decisions that are inextricably intertwined with the conduct of the military mission."22

Over the next few decades, the Feres doctrine expanded beyond personal injury claims and became relevant in the context of privacy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Feres and the Privacy Act: Are Military Personnel Records Protected?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.