Masculinity in Popular Sitcoms, 1955-1960 and 2000-2005

By Miller, Diana | Culture, Society and Masculinities, Fall 2011 | Go to article overview

Masculinity in Popular Sitcoms, 1955-1960 and 2000-2005


Miller, Diana, Culture, Society and Masculinities


Common wisdom holds that men as represented in sitcoms have changed substantially from the wise, loving patriarchs of the 1950s, but we currently lack a broad understanding of these changes. Using a random sample of sitcoms from 1955-1960 and 2000-2005, this paper shows that masculinity in sitcoms has actually evolved little since the 1950s. Some changes reflect real evolutions in masculinities and prevent male sitcom characters from becoming dated, such as their move away from nuclear families. Other changes demonstrate a complex relationship between the representation and reality of masculinity, and I argue that understanding the conditions under which sitcoms are produced, as well as their content, helps us unpack this relationship.

KEYWORDS MASCUUNITY, MEDIA STUDIES, SITCOMS, CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY, CULTURE INDUSTRY

Common wisdom holds that representations of masculinity in sitcoms have changed substantially since the beginning of the television era. While 1950s sitcom fathers like Ward Cleaver and Ozzy Nelson are remembered as wise and loving patriarchs, modern sitcom men are often selfish, dependent, or otherwise flawed Reimers, 2003; Scharrer, 2001). Some scholars suggest that evolving representations of masculinity on television reflect the evolution of masculinity in real life Douglas & Olson, 1995; Schrarrer). But has masculinity in sitcoms really changed, or is this view distorted by nostalgia and selective cultural memory? In what ways do modern representations of masculinity differ from those in 1950s sitcoms, and in what ways are they unchanged? Furthermore, how do representations of masculinity in the sitcom universe map onto or disconnect from North American masculinities?

Many studies provide in-depth analyses of particular aspects of masculinity in a few sitcoms see Hanke, 1998; Linder, 2005; McEachern, 1999). Yet, there is also a need to understand generally how masculinity is represented in sitcoms, and how that representation has or has not changed. Furthermore, many studies relate television characters to social contexts as if the former is an unproblematic representation of the latter see Klumas & Marchant, 1994). However, no form of culture is mirror. Sitcoms, like any cultural object, are shaped by the societies in which they emerge, but also by the specific people, processes, and industries that produce them Alexander, 2003; Griswold, 1981), and understanding the production processes can provide a deeper understanding of the points at which representation and reality connect and diverge.

I use a content analysis of randomly sampled popular sitcoms from two time periods, 1955-1960 and 2000-2005, to address the question: how, if at all, have portrayals of masculinity in sitcoms changed from the 1950s to the present day? I find that men in sitcoms have not changed as much as common wisdom may suggest. Their family structures have changed to keep up with real demographic changes and they have largely abandoned behaviors that would make them appear outdated, such as a formal politeness and unidirectional displays of authority. However, men in modern sitcoms are more similar overall to men in 1950s sitcoms than they are different.

I also argue that a thorough understanding of the few observed changes requires an analysis of both North American masculinities and the incentives and constraints of the television industry. Some changes in culturally available ways of doing masculinity are taken up fairly unproblematically in the sitcom universe, but others are transformed or not taken up at all. Understanding the processes by which sitcoms are produced sheds light on why and how images of masculinity in sitcoms take the forms that they do.

This overall picture of how men are portrayed in sitcoms is significant because media images fundamentally shape the social contexts in which individuals act. Whether we understand media images as texts that organize discourse and local social relations Smith, 1989) or as "symbolic resources" that people strategically apply to their own lives Swidler, 1986), the point is the same: media portrayals of men provide models that individual men can emulate or reject, and that shape culturally available standards to which men may be held accountable West & Zimmerman, 1987). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Masculinity in Popular Sitcoms, 1955-1960 and 2000-2005
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.