Restructuring U.S. Foreign Assistance in the Wake of the Arab Spring

By O'Sullivan, Mathew | Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, September/October 2011 | Go to article overview

Restructuring U.S. Foreign Assistance in the Wake of the Arab Spring


O'Sullivan, Mathew, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs


Foreign aid is the U.S. government's most significant and wide-reaching channel of involvement in the Middle East. Through financial assistance, Washington seeks to influence markets, militaries, societies and governments abroad. But just as recent popular uprisings demonstrate the Arab world's disapproval of long-standing regimes, so too do they indicate objection to the external powers that have backed and funded the region's status quo.

A recent poll by Zogby International reveals that favorable attitudes toward the United States in the Middle East are lower now than they were in 2008, during the last year of George W. Bush's presidency. This represents a marked shift from the relatively positive perceptions of the American government following President Barack Obama's Cairo speech in 2009. Polling conducted by the Abu Dhabi Gallup Center between March and April 2011 shows 52 percent of Egyptians opposing any sort of U.S. economic aid to their country at all.

Although these stances may be in part a product of the vocal political climate currently pervading the Middle East, they unquestionably reveal the need for a drastic transformation of America's financial engagement in the region. A new approach should stabilize Middle Eastern economies in order to bolster the progress of the Arab Spring, empower individuals to become involved in public affairs, and demonstrate that Washington is interested in supporting the people of the Middle East, and not just the governments that march in step with U.S. policy.

In the months since the Arab Spring blossomed, both President Obama and U.S. policymakers have sought to communicate a change in aid strategy-away from top-down statebuilding and toward increased civil society assistance, investments in small- and medium-sized enterprises, and public-private partnerships. Ideally, such efforts would bypass corruption-ridden state bureaucracies and allow communities to achieve prosperity and democracy through decentralized and locally tailored means. Obama's May 19 pledge of $2 billion to the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) for new ventures in Egypt and Tunisia supports the government's recent and growing focus on producing bottom-up development by providing much-needed capital to entrepreneurs in the Middle East and by building bridges between U.S. and Arab businesses.

At a July 21 event hosted by the Modernizing Foreign Assistance Network (MFAN), Tamara Cofman Wittes, formerly with the Brookings Institution's Saban Center for Middle East Policy and now deputy assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, further conveyed the U.S. government's intent to transform its aid strategy, stating that "the citizens of the region have made their own priorities clear" and that Washington will redirect foreign assistance programs according to the demands and democratic framework put forth by the Arab public. Wittes cited the State Department's Middle East Partnership Initiative as an example: it distributes grants of $25,000 to $100,000 to civil society groups that are locally run and benefit their own communities. Such initiatives are extremely important-especially since historically, as noted by James Zogby of the Arab American Institute, eighty-two cents on the dollar of foreign assistance have remained in American hands through donations and payments to major development organizations and U.S. contractors.

Despite these efforts, Washington's rhetoric on restructuring its foreign assistance still fails to overcome many of the weaknesses that have defined its Middle East aid policies and provided support to autocratic regimes for decades. In a review of the federal budget and appropriations for fiscal year 2012, Stephen McInerny of the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) describes burdens on U.S. foreign assistance, including "dysfunction in the congressional appropriations process," unsatisfactory levels of funding for democracy programs and civilian assistance throughout the region, and an enduring "imbalance between military and nonmilitary aid. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Restructuring U.S. Foreign Assistance in the Wake of the Arab Spring
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.