Does Making Journalism More Public Make a Difference? A Critical Review of Evaluative Research on Public Journalism

By Massey, Brian L.; Haas, Tanni | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Autumn 2002 | Go to article overview

Does Making Journalism More Public Make a Difference? A Critical Review of Evaluative Research on Public Journalism


Massey, Brian L., Haas, Tanni, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


A critical review of forty-seven evaluative studies on public journalism shows that its philosophy and newswork practices have had generally limited effects on the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of journalists and news audiences. These works tend to focus on a handful of showcase public-journalism news organizations and projects. Methodological shortcomings found in several of the studies are discussed. Suggestions for future research are offered.

The U.S. journalistic reform movement known as "public," "civic," or "citizen-based" journalism) has sparked a number of evaluative studies since it emerged in the late 1980s.2 The movement's ultimate goal is to help revitalize civic life in the United States. To achieve that, it would seemingly need to succeed at two broad objectives. First, journalists must be convinced to use public journalism's practices to repair the damage that traditional journalism has been accused of causing to the public's interest and participation in the civic life of their communities and the nation. Second, public journalism must make a difference among news audiences. Because of it, more "average citizens" should be convinced to think about and participate in civic affairs more often.

However, much of the "empirical evidence about whether civic journalism actually is achieving its objectives is fragmentary and impressionistic. "3 Success often is claimed on the basis of "`look what we did ... look how we did it" anecdotes. This study offers a fuller assessment of what is known and what more should be known about public journalism's capacity to modify the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of U.S. journalists and news audiences.

Public Journalism Research

Evaluative studies on public journalism were identified primarily from Communication Abstracts and the AEJMC convention paper databases To be included in the analysis, a study had to focus explicitly on public journalism's attitudinal or behavioral effects on journalists or news audiences. It had to use quantitative or qualitative social-scientific research methods, and to include data not already published. This excluded re-analyses, review articles, and anecdotal narratives.

We located forty-seven evaluative studies that fit the selection criteria. A quarter of them included national-sample surveys of newsmedia executives or journalists. Three-fifths looked at newspapers and five looked at television news departments. Nine focused on both print and broadcast news media, mostly as public-journalism project partners.

There was a tendency among these works to concentrate on a handful of early-adopter "public" news organizations. The Wichita Eagle (Kansas) or the Charlotte Observer (North Carolina), or both, were included in more than one-third of the thirty-nine studies that looked at specific news-media organizations. Fifteen percent featured the Wisconsin State Journal of Madison. The Journal also was a partner in the multiple-media "We the People/Wisconsin" project that was the sole or partial focus of four media-specific studies. "We the People" partner WISC-TV of Madison and KRON-TV of San Francisco were included in five studies each, making them the most researched public-journalism broadcasters.

As Table 1 shows, the majority of the studies focused solely on one of the following research concerns: journalists' attitudes and beliefs about public journalism, their "public" newswork behaviors, and public journalism's effects on news audiences. The continuum that this tripartite division suggests reflects the widely held assumption that journalists' favorable attitudes and beliefs about public journalism may influence their newswork behaviors, and that their newly "public" news-reporting practices may produce measurable attitudinal and behavioral effects on news audiences.6 Admittedly, the dynamic of causality likely is more complicated, if causation is even part of the equation. For our purposes, the distinction between journalistic attitudes, newswork behaviors, and audience effects provided a useful organizing heuristic. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Does Making Journalism More Public Make a Difference? A Critical Review of Evaluative Research on Public Journalism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.