When Courts Collide: Integrated Domestic Violence Courts and Court Pluralism

By MacDowell, Elizabeth L. | Texas Journal of Women, Gender, and the Law, April 1, 2011 | Go to article overview

When Courts Collide: Integrated Domestic Violence Courts and Court Pluralism


MacDowell, Elizabeth L., Texas Journal of Women, Gender, and the Law


I. INTRODUCTION

Specialized domestic violence courts that integrate criminal and civil functions are often suggested by reformers as a way to improve court-based approaches to the problem of domestic violence.1 These reformers argue that a fragmented court system, in which a single incident of domestic violence can spawn multiple civil and criminal actions, makes it difficult for victims to access important legal remedies and leads to conflicting court orders, endangering victims and allowing perpetrators to evade accountability.2 Specialized, integrated domestic violence courts are purported to solve these problems by consolidating, to the greatest extent possible, civil and criminal dockets relating to domestic violence, with the paradigmatic integrated court assigning all related civil and criminal cases to a single judicial officer.3 However, reformers fail to show that integrating criminal and civil courts is necessary to solve problems identified with multiple forums. Moreover, recommendations for integrated domestic violence courts often ignore the fundamentally different purposes and characters of criminal and civil courts.

Broadly speaking, criminal courts are traditionally concerned with accountability to social norms rather than individual needs.4 As such, they serve a powerful educative function that is strengthened by the application of consistent policies and procedures.5 The significance of applying these principles to domestic violence - a major social problem that was by turns condoned or disregarded by the American justice system until the latter part of the twentieth century - has been especially profound, although subject to controversy and critique from both within and outside the feminist antidomestic violence movement.6

While civil courts may share the norm-setting function of criminal courts with respect to domestic violence,7 in contrast to the criminal justice system, the civil system is characterized by relative flexibility and individual discretion.8 Unlike criminal courts, where state interests generally govern, civil courts are accessed voluntarily by victims of domestic violence, who determine when and how to present their cases and what remedies to seek within the confines of the law.9 On the other hand, the individualistic bent of civil court lends itself to less formal legal procedures, especially in the family courts where victims will most likely seek assistance, and to a de-emphasis of accountability for perpetrators.10

From the perspective of victims of domestic violence, the fundamentally different cultures and functions of the criminal and civil courts each carry their own advantages and pitfalls. Integrating these courts into a single, specialized domestic violence court will inevitably alter the nature of each. Integration, then, raises a number of important questions, including: Which court features will predominate and to what effect? To the extent each court system offers potential advantages and pitfalls, will integrated courts be an improvement, or will the strengths of each be compromised or lost? Moreover, are these risks worth taking?

In the absence of uniform practices or reliable data on existing integrated courts, exploring these questions requires analyzing both the ideals and the drawbacks of both systems.11 Recent legal scholarship continues a tendency to focus on critiques of the criminal justice system's response to domestic violence,12 failing to ask the crucial question: as compared to what? Problems experienced by victims of domestic violence in civil forums have been extensively documented.13 But problems beyond those purportedly relating to court fragmentation are rarely acknowledged by advocates of integrated courts.14 Other scholars have idealized civil forums for the relative autonomy and choice available to victims seeking resolution of their legal claims. 5 Both perspectives obscure the costs victims of domestic violence suffer as a result of the relative informality of civil forums such as family court. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

When Courts Collide: Integrated Domestic Violence Courts and Court Pluralism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit OpenDyslexic.org.

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.