Prescription Fraud: Characteristics, Consequences, and Influences

By Payne, Brian K.; Dabney, Dean | Journal of Drug Issues, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview

Prescription Fraud: Characteristics, Consequences, and Influences


Payne, Brian K., Dabney, Dean, Journal of Drug Issues


This research examines the characteristics, consequences, and potential factors impacting the prevalence of prescription fraud committed by pharmacy employees. Using standard thematic content analysis, 292 cases prosecuted by Medicaid Fraud Control Units throughout the nation are analyzed. Preliminary results reveal that certain kinds of fraud (generic substitution, short-counting, and filling prescriptions without a refill) are committed more regularly, or at least detected more readily than other kinds of fraud Most of the prosecutions involved pharmacists accused of fraud and many of the offenses were committed in groups. Implications for future research and policy are provided.

Introduction

Pharmacists are responsible for filling 1.6 billion prescriptions annually in the United States. (Wivell and Wilson 1994). Although the majority of these prescriptions are filled legally, recent investigations suggest that some pharmacists use various methods to illegally tamper with the prescriptions that they fill. Despite the fact that these illicit behaviors can and do result in significant financial and physical harm to both the health care system and the individual medical consumer, the American public has largely ignored this lucrative white-collar crime (Taylor 1992). This lack of concern is somewhat understandable given the fact that the American public has historically maintained a high degree of trust in pharmacists and other health care professionals (Ford 1992; Pontell et al. 1982; Sutherland 1949; Wilson et al.1985). For example, for 10 years public opinion research has rated pharmacy as the most honest and ethical occupation (McAneny and Moore, 1994). Building on these data, Wivell and Wilson (1994:38) point out that pharmacists "[garner] higher marks for honesty and ethical standards than the clergy."

Despite this high degree of public confidence, there is reason to believe some pharmacists regularly defraud the Medicaid system. These acts are commonly classified as prescription fraud. Recent research on this topic (Taylor 1992) outlines a variety of innovative ways in which pharmacists are able to defraud the Medicaid system. For instance, upcoding refers to situations wherein a pharmacist fills a prescription with a cheaper generic drug but bills Medicaid for the originally prescribed, more expensive brand-name drug.1 Phantom billing is a term used to describe scenarios in which a pharmacist bills Medicaid for prescriptions not provided to the recipient. Double billing refers to situations wherein more than one insurance company is billed for a single set of prescriptions. The practice of kickbacks involves situations where pharmacists receive or provide funds to or from other health care providers in exchange for referrals. As subsequent discussion will demonstrate, these and other innovative schemes represent a serious threat to the health care delivery system in this country.

Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) are given the responsibility of detecting, investigating, and prosecuting Medicaid fraud (Bailey 1991); therefore, Medicaid prescription fraud falls under their jurisdiction. Interestingly, it was not until the 1980s that MFCUs began to uncover the various illicit prescription schemes being used to defraud the Medicaid system. Subsequent investigations have revealed that prescription fraud is a profitable and prevalent offense.

Given the illusive nature of these acts, the precise amount of prescription fraud occurring is unknown. Instead, we must rely on estimates to gauge the seriousness of this problem. The available estimates indicate that 10% of all funds spent on health care is lost to fraud and abuse in the health care arena (Ford 1992:2). Note that these estimates translate into losses of $50 to $80 billion a year (Taylor 1992:17). According to Ford (1992:2) such losses will contribute, along with other factors, to an increase in spending in health care. Specifically, Ford predicts that costs will increase from $280 billion in 1982 to $2 trillion by the year 2000. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Prescription Fraud: Characteristics, Consequences, and Influences
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.