Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies: Working in the Bordello of History

By Mowry, Melissa | Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation, April 1, 2009 | Go to article overview

Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies: Working in the Bordello of History


Mowry, Melissa, Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation


Feminism's early interventions in the study of Anglophone culture over the long eighteenth century were bold and radicaUy altered our understanding of the period. With Felicity Nussbaum's The Brink of All We Hate: English Satires on Women, 1660-1750 (1984), Ruth Perry's The Celebrated Mary Astell (1986), Elaine Hobby's A Virtue of Necessity (1989), and Donna Landry's The Muses of Resistance (1990), to name just a few of the important studies, feminism shattered the fiterary canon and made courses on the early English novel and eighteenth-century Uterature unimaginable without figures tike Aphra Behn, Delarivier Manley, Eliza Ha)TWOOd, and Frances Burney. There is, among those who led the argument by founding the ASECS Women's Caucus and those of us who foUow in their footsteps, a justifiable sense of pride and satisfaction in thus altering the way undergraduates and graduates encounter the eighteenth century. But this sea-change has also been shadowed by a sense of anxiety and an underlying fear that, in achieving its most prominent goal, feminism rendered itself obsolete. Once the question of the canon had been ceded, what was left for feminism to contribute to eighteenth-century studies?

The most sustained response to the question has come from scholars foUowing the lead of "new formalism" who have argued either expUcitly or impUcitly that feminism's most valuable contribution to eighteenth-century studies now lies in the realm of epistemology generaUy and aesthetics in particular.1 However, as Marjorie Levinson has argued recently, "new formalism" never reaUy rose to the level of a "theory" because it never fully articulated what was at stake in its arguments and was, thus, ill-equipped to devise a methodology.2 Likewise, the new "feminist epistemologies" have inspired nuanced, highly insightful, local readings of specific authors that seem ill-equipped to disclose how it is that they advance, participate in, or even foreground feminism beyond the fact that they tend to focus on women writers struggling with the gendered contradictions of their own and/or their readers' aesthetic pleasure.3 While the effort to open a new frontier in feminism and eighteenth-century studies is valuable and, indeed, much work remains to be done by feminists on both the aesthetic and on epistemology, it is disturbing that the trumpeting of a "new feminism" is attended by a sense that we have finished our business with the past. I want to suggest here that, as feminists, our business with history is not done by half, and beyond that our business with History, as both a political and a social fiction, is exactly what we need to be focusing on.

Most recent analyses of feminism's relation to eighteenth-century studies have focused on the early recovery work. But, in the 1990s, a small group of scholars began to expand that project radically by making the case that feminist literary history had remained blind to the important work and writings of non-elite women. Hobby, of course, did critical work bringing to light the writings of radical and sectarian women; likewise Landry's Muses of Resistance: Laboring-Class Women's Poetry in Britain, 1739-1796 revealed not only a brief moment in eighteenth-century literary history when laboring women had appreciative authences for their writing but also the foreclosure of that moment. More recently, Paula McDowell's groundbreaking study The Women of Grub Street (1998) offered remarkable evidence and insight into women's role as both the producers and purveyors of print culture, as well as a more rigorous and self -aware model for how we might undertake the production of new knowledge about non-elite women. Peculiarly, these studies have not had the same effect on undergraduate and graduate curricula. With few exceptions, they have been embraced largely as background work that eliminates our understanding of "mainstream" literature but not as works that fundamentally reorient our understanding of eighteenth-century culture. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Feminism and Eighteenth-Century Studies: Working in the Bordello of History
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.