The Influence of Nondiagnostic Information and Victim Stereotypes on Perceptions of Guilt

By Rempala, Daniel M.; Geers, Andrew L. | Western Criminology Review, November 2011 | Go to article overview

The Influence of Nondiagnostic Information and Victim Stereotypes on Perceptions of Guilt


Rempala, Daniel M., Geers, Andrew L., Western Criminology Review


Abstract: Recent research has revealed that increasing nondiagnostic information about victims in rape trial scenarios decreases guilty verdicts. This finding contradicts several existing theoretical positions that predict nondiagnostic information about a target is beneficial to that target. Three experiments are presented to resolve this incongruity. It is hypothesized that greater nondiagnostic victim information can increase use of victim stereotypes. As such, we predicted that increasing nondiagnostic victim information decreases the number of guilty verdicts in trials featuring strongly negative victim stereotypes (e.g., rape trials), but not trials without strongly negative victim stereotypes (e.g., assault trials). In Study 1, nondiagnostic victim information in an assault trial scenario led to more-rather than fewer-guilty verdicts. In Study 2, increasing nondiagnostic victim information led to increased negative stereotyped perceptions in a rape trial scenario but not an assault trial scenario. In Study 3, nondiagnostic information showed no difference on the impact on the perception of male versus female victims of assault. Finally, we demonstrate the mechanisms by which nondiagnostic target information alters trial verdicts.

Keywords: assault trials, nondiagnostic information, victim stereotypes.

INTRODUCTION

During the course of a jury trial, many factors can sway the opinions of jurors. Some factors are obvious and intuitive (e.g., eyewitness confidence, opinions of other jurors, the presence of a videotaped confession), while other influential factors are not obvious or intuitive (e.g., the order in which information is presented, jury size; Brewer and Wells 2006; Horowitz and Bordens 2002; MacCoun 1989). In the present research, we examined the relationship between perceptions of guilt and one not-so-obvious factor, the presence of nondiagnostic information about the parties involved in the trial.

Nondiagnostic Information

Diagnostic information has been defined as "information relevant to the judgment in question" (Kunda and Thagard 1996:291). Thus, nondiagnostic information is information irrelevant to the judgment in question, and in a criminal trial, nondiagnostic information would be information irrelevant to the defendant's guilt.

Nondiagnostic information about a target can take many forms (e.g., demographic information, visual information). Under direct observation, people give off a wealth of information by their actions, whether through their tone of voice, body posture, or facial expressions. Observers use this information to judge a target's personal attributes even when the observer does not have the luxury of viewing the target for extended periods of time or across multiple situations (Ambady, Bernieri, and Richeson 2001). In many cases, salient features of the target, such as bodily cues that trigger stereotypes, are also used to form impressions. Initial impressions based on such limited information can be generated quickly and can also be quite rigid (Ambady et al. 2001).

Written, descriptive information can be used to create a similar effect. Researchers (Efran 1974; Landy and Aronson 1969) have shown that defendants in trial scenarios who are described positively (e.g., attractive, professional) are less likely to be found guilty, whereas targets who are described negatively (e.g., unattractive, manual laborer) are more likely to be found guilty. Even though this descriptive information is irrelevant to the guilt or innocence of a target, these results are not surprising, since impression formation studies have shown that observers judge and respond to targets with enviable characteristics more positively across a variety of situations (Eagly et al. 1991; Uleman, Newman, and Moskowitz 1996).

What happens, though, when the descriptive information is unrelated to the case at hand and is not obviously positive or negative? It is thought that nondiagnostic information about a target can also serve to increase the salience of that target. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Influence of Nondiagnostic Information and Victim Stereotypes on Perceptions of Guilt
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.