Sharia and Shah Bano: Multiculturalism and Women's Rights

By Philips, Amali | Anthropologica, July 1, 2011 | Go to article overview

Sharia and Shah Bano: Multiculturalism and Women's Rights


Philips, Amali, Anthropologica


Introduction

This article traces the unfolding and outcome of the sharia controversy in Ontario, Canada and the Shah Bano conflict in India to discuss then- siimlarities and differences in relation to the key issues of women's rights, cultural rights and identity poUtics in multicultural settings. Specifically, I draw insights from the two cases to examine their implications for multiculturalism and women's rights as equal citizens.

The rights of cultural minorities and the ideals and values of democratic citizenship are two areas that have received considerable attention in recent times (KymUcka and Norman 2000). They are also the areas that have caused the most tension in Canada and countries such as France, England and Germany with a significant number of immigrants. In these countries, personal laws and other cultural symbols (e.g., veüing) have become the battleground for the defense of purportedly "authentic" religious and ethnic traditions and identities, with gender often being the focal point in these battles. MulticulturaUsm has provided a context for groups to negotiate their coUective cultural rights and citizenship rights as part of multicultural accommodation and equality of citizenship (see Asad 2006; Kepel 2004; Soysal 2001; Turner 1993; Wilson 1997; Yuval-Davis 1997). "Culture" is also becoming a "ubiquitous synonym for identity" (Benhabib 2002:1; Sahlins 1999), and the "claims of cultures" for recognition and protection (Kymlicka 1996) have transformed the "political" and "public" arenas into sites of conflict and contestation. These developments have brought into sharp relief the tension between the rights of religious minorities and the equality rights of women in multicultural societies.

A dramatic manifestation of these tensions occurred on 8 September 2005, when several cities in Canada and across Europe held mass protests against a proposal to. establish sharia courts in the Province of Ontario, Canada. SimUar tensions have arisen in the multicultural societies of South Asia with plural legal systems governing the public and private realms. A highly publicized instance is the Shah Bano case in India, where the Supreme Court, in 1985, ruled in favour of Shah Bano, a divorced Muslim woman who challenged her husband for extended maintenance in contravention of Muslim Personal Law. The opposition of Muslim groups to the court ruling forced the Government of India to override the Supreme Court's decision and enact the Muslim Women's Protection of Rights on Divorce law, which entrenched Muslim personal law and placed the responsibility for protecting divorced women after the iddat1 period on their natal families and not their husbands. In Canada, protests against sharia courts resulted in the government of Ontario moving away from religious arbitration in family disputes, previously permitted under an arbitration law of the province.

I use the sharia and Shah Bano cases as comparative sites to interrogate the contentious issue of group rights and women's citizenship rights with particular reference to religious-based personal laws. My paper falls within the tradition of the comparative approach in anthropology, and is in keeping with critical legal anthropological (Moore 2001; Wilson 1997) and feminist discourses on citizenship in national and transnational settings (McCain and Grossman 2009; Merry 2006; Mukhopadhyay 1994; Sweetman 2004). My interest in personal laws partly stems from my research on personal law disputes involving Christian women in the southern Indian state of Kerala. My purpose in comparing Canada and India, however, needs elaboration.

Multiculturalism emerged in Canada as the "official doctrine and corresponding practices" (Fieras and Elliott 1992:22) to manage (Bannerji 2000) and accommodate the cultural diversity of immigrants, Aboriginal communities and French and English groups (Fieras and Elliott 1992). Charles Taylor (1992:25) characterizes the "politics of multiculturalism" as "politics of recognition," with two distinct components. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Sharia and Shah Bano: Multiculturalism and Women's Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.