Introduction

By Gorfinkel, Elena | Framework, Spring 2012 | Go to article overview

Introduction


Gorfinkel, Elena, Framework


This dossier addresses a twin set of commonplaces. The first one is that work and its figuration are ambiguously central to the history of cinema, from Louis Lumiere's Workers Leaving the Factory (FR, 1895) onward. The Lumiere film begins with the end of the working day; thus, we never see the actual labor inside the factory walls. The actors, Lumiere's own employees, are put to work by the new invention of the cinema precisely at the fulcrum point of the day which signals their escape from the rationalized, mea sured time of the industrial workplace. Spilling out from the shop floor and through the factory gates, the workers make their way past and beyond the camera's stationary gaze, their movement impressed upon, captured by film. The dividing moment between labor and leisure, between work and that which exists outside it- spatially, temporally- folds into an inscription of a medium's foundational instant. This example reminds us that all of cinema is in some sense a spectacularized product of a labor that remains consistently off- scene-be it the labor behind the camera, in the bodies placed before it, or in those exertions that evade its view, transpiring offscreen, out of frame, before, after, and beyond it.

The second commonplace thus follows that although work is central to a collaborative, effort- intensive medium, human labor often remains the repressed of filmic repre sen ta tion. As Harun Farocki notes regarding the Lumiere film, and more broadly on cinema's historical avoidance of the factory as subject or mise- en- scene: "the resolution of the workers' motion represents something, that the visible movement of people is standing in for the absent and invisible movement of goods, money, and ideas circulating in industry."1 On the one hand, a materialization of labor, its traces, and effects, and on the other, a dissipation into abstraction so central to the constitution of capital's circulations, exchanges, flows, and substitutions. Films screen and also screen out the labor that subtends them as aesthetic "works," as works of art.

The essays in this dossier seek to explore this paradox of labor's simultaneous visibility and invisibility in order to use work as a heuristic to think about the film experience in history and in its bearing on contemporary trends in global cinema, aesthetics, and politics, and, indeed, the inherence of politics in aesthetics. Proceeding from David James's claim that "as every film ... internalizes the conditions of its production, it makes itself an allegory of them,"2 the essays collected here are all interested in how films bear the residue- formally, aesthetically- of relations of production. Thus, the dossier proposes that labor has aesthetic consequence and urgency: the image is the product of work and does a certain kind of work, but also makes the spectator work.

Yet there is also a necessity to think of labor as not only a structural aporia of a repre sen ta tional medium, its aesthetics and technology, but of our economic present as well. In the wake of post- Fordist, neoliberal policies of flexibilization, casualization, and atomization, the crux of work is made increasingly "immaterial," precarious, abstract, and even further alienated- alienated from any form of disaffection that may mobilize, agitate, or make a demand. In a po liti cal moment in which the profit motives of late capitalism proceed unabated by economic crisis and collapse, bankruptcy, and public protest, and in which, in the United States, an assault on public- sector employees and collective bargaining attempts to negate any modicum of accountability of corporate entities to the socius, of employers to employees, and makes self- determination through worker collective action a receding, seemingly foolhardy aspiration, we must attend to labor's value in both its concrete and conceptual registers.

Approaches to questions of labor in film studies scholarship have generally employed analyses of modes of production, industrial structures, studio or ga ni za tion, trade unionization, and repre sen ta tions of social class in film narratives, and have primarily focused on Hollywood cinema. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Introduction
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.