Reading the Underthought: Jewish Hermeneutics and the Christian Poetry of Hopkins and Eliot

By Omer-Sherman, Ranen | Style, Winter 2011 | Go to article overview

Reading the Underthought: Jewish Hermeneutics and the Christian Poetry of Hopkins and Eliot


Omer-Sherman, Ranen, Style


Kinereth Meyer and Rachel Salmon Deshen. Reading the Underthought: Jewish Hermeneutics and the Christian Poetry of Hopkins and Eliot. Jewish Literature and Culture. Bloomington: Catholic U of America P, 2010. xiiii + 314 pp.

Kinereth Meyer and Rachel Salmon Deshen, the coauthors of this challenging and often rewarding study, are two English professors based at Bar-Ilan University in Israel whose previous work includes important essays on TS. Eliot and Gerard Manley Hopkins. Here they undertake the difficult challenge of reading the latter' s Christian religious poetry against the grain; in other words from their perspective as Jewish readers and critics. As they declare in their introductory chapter, the authors are more drawn to the aggadic ("homiletic, legendary, theological, and ethical") as well as halakhic ("legal") traditions, rather than Judaism's more mystical and esoteric trajectories, including the scholarship of Gershom Scholem and others (13). This is what they identify as the crucial contrast between the discursive practices of ancient rabbinics with that of Christian thought:

For Christian hermeneutics, the language of Scripture is a veil, but that veil can be pierced or lifted to reveal full, essential meaning, because ultimate reality itself has become directly perceivable, knowable at least to some extent, through the Incarnation. This kind of reading is informed by . . .a hermeneutics of adequation: that which is known (the Incarnation, Crucifixion, and Resurrection) before, beyond, behind the written word makes possible the perception of the true meaning of the words that bear witness to it. In contrast, rabbinic hermeneutics does not attempt to move beyond language; within the Jewish tradition, language leads always to more language, never to a non-discursive presence.

(emphasis in original; 13-14)

With these contrasting modes in mind, the authors undertake an exploration of the remarkable ways that Judaism's interpretive traditions can produce fecund readings of narratives alien to it, claiming that: "strategies used by the Rabbis of the Talmud and the Midrash...were as innovative in respect to textual analyses as those of our postmodern period. Identifying the knots, gaps and cruxes in the biblical text, the Rabbis enlarged upon and contested each other's interpretations and constantly offered new ones, as if they were out to exhaust every possibility of what they considered an absolute and infinite text" (19). At the same time, they hasten to point out that while rabbinic hermeneutics might "appear exotic, it shares enough common ground with the dominant culture in order to enter into viable conversation with it" (19). While they do not pretend to be able to show the reader precisely how that tradition of multiplicity and infinitude directly engenders the readings they produce, Meyer and Deshen nonetheless strive to delineate 'close interrelations between rabbinic hermeneutic practice" (19) and the approaches they take to Hopkins and Eliot (they hope that their example will inspire further cross-cultural interpretive experiments from other traditions). For the most part they succeed, often producing vigorous, rigorous, and compelling insights.

The authors perceived Hopkins and Eliot as especially pertinent for their project because each embodies an intertextual relationship to two theological traditions, as religious converts. To their credit, Meyer and Deshen closely delineate the complex ramifications of those conversions so vividly that the reader immediately grasps why they appealed to their imagination. Attentive readers may independently conclude that Hopkins's and Eliot's boundary-crossings represent an insider-outsider consciousness not unlike the authors' own position, which after all entailed:

not only religious commitment, but national identity as well; both were expatriates (only Eliot by choice) and both gave up a more liberal form of Protestantism for adherence to a Catholic faith. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reading the Underthought: Jewish Hermeneutics and the Christian Poetry of Hopkins and Eliot
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.