A Comparison of Anti-Manipulation Rules in U.S. and Eu Electricity and Natural Gas Markets: A Proposal for a Common Standard

By Ledgerwood, Shaun; Harris, Dan | Energy Law Journal, January 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

A Comparison of Anti-Manipulation Rules in U.S. and Eu Electricity and Natural Gas Markets: A Proposal for a Common Standard


Ledgerwood, Shaun, Harris, Dan, Energy Law Journal


Synopsis: In this paper, we describe the development and current status of anti- manipulation rules as they apply to wholesale electricity and natural gas markets in the United States and the European Union, including the institutions that are responsible for overseeing these rules. We then compare and contrast these jurisdictions to discuss similarities, differences, and potential gaps in coverage within and across their internal markets. We note that while the behavior prohibited by the U.S. and EU statutes is remarkably similar, there is in fact no common standard for defining market manipulation. The absence of a common EU/U.S. framework for examining manipulative behavior introduces uncertainty into compliance efforts by failing to provide safe harbors and by potentially wasting scarce resources through efforts to continually detect and deter behavior that is in fact legitimate. We propose an economic framework to describe manipulation in a manner that could generally harmonize such compliance and enforcement efforts, providing a uniform approach to the detection, analysis and punishment of manipulative behavior within and across both the U.S. and EU jurisdictions.

I. INTRODUCTION

The last decade has witnessed an unprecedented volume of legislation in the United States and the European Union prohibiting the manipulation of wholesale natural gas and electricity markets. In the United States, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were given new fraud-based anti-manipulation statutes and enhanced power to monitor for, detect, and deter manipulative behavior, evidenced most recently by the FERC's $245 million settlement with Constellation Energy Commodities Group, Inc.1 The European Union has also made bold steps by revising its key piece of market abuse legislation and for the first time extending market abuse legislation to wholesale energy markets, which were previously covered only by general antitrust law. The new anti-manipulation, information disclosure, and inside information laws that will apply to energy markets represent the largest change to how EU energy markets will function since the beginning of the European Union's liberalization project in 1998 and will be overseen by two new EU level institutions.

Despite significant differences in the institutional processes used to derive their respective anti-manipulation laws and in the maturity and complexity of the physical and financial markets that are to be regulated, the behavior prohibited by the U.S. and EU statutes is strikingly similar. "Fraud-based" behavior is prohibited by all of these anti-manipulations statutes, with actions that create (or attempt to create) an "artificial price" prohibited in the European Union and by the CFTC in the United States. Although this statutory congruity suggests that a uniform approach to analyzing manipulative behavior is in place, the limited case precedent tried on such issues lacks a cohesive logic. The absence of a cogent framework for examining manipulative behavior introduces uncertainty into compliance efforts by failing to provide safe harbors from enforcement scrutiny and could waste scarce regulatory resources through inefficient efforts to continually detect and deter behavior that is poorly understood and inconsistently defined.

In this article, we seek to address these issues by proposing an economic framework that could provide uniformity to the analysis of manipulative behavior across cases, agencies, statutes, and continents. The framework could also reduce the reliance upon subjective judgment in identifying actions that do (and do not) cause manipulation. In Section II, we summarize the evolution of the anti-manipulation laws that are now relevant to wholesale electricity and natural gas markets in the United States and European Union. In Section III, we compare and contrast these enforcement regimes to show the need for the unifying framework we propose herein. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparison of Anti-Manipulation Rules in U.S. and Eu Electricity and Natural Gas Markets: A Proposal for a Common Standard
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.