Education and Federalism: The Last Line of Defence

By Hodkinson, Byron | Review - Institute of Public Affairs, September 2011 | Go to article overview

Education and Federalism: The Last Line of Defence


Hodkinson, Byron, Review - Institute of Public Affairs


The only way the national curriculum can be scuppered now is through the High Court, writes Byron Hodkinson.

One of federalism's great virtues is that it provides a means to smaller government. Demarcated power limits the spending excesses of individual governments and provides a check to overarching state authority.

The politics of Australian federalism have gradually become more benign in recent years. State governments (and oppositions) have been content to adopt a small target strategy and shirk any inclination (and responsibility) to challenge the dominance of the Commonwealth's legislative reach or tax base. In fairness, the High Court hasn't exacdy encouraged political disobethence by the states against federal intervention in traditional state responsibilities, given the decisions in the Engineers' Case and the Tasmanian Dam Case, amongst others. Unfortunately, this pattern of behaviour has continued, with the national partnership agreement to fund the national curriculum and subsequent political deals for states to implement it.

Federalist advocates have lamented this encroachment of the federal government into traditional areas of state responsibility for decades.

Criticism of the concept of a national curriculum is a natural extension of such sentiment. These pages, as well as the IPA monograph, The National Curriculum: A Critique, edited by Chris Berg, have rightly been sceptical of the conceptual merits of, and content contained in the national curriculum. With parts of the history syllabus suggesting that human rights were somehow conceived in post-war Europe with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, rather than through the development of liberal democracy centuries earlier, you'd be forgiven for thinking that the word 'revisionist' was missing from its tide.

One angle that opponents of the curriculum appear not to have yet fully considered is the constitutional basis on which it is funded, and administered by the Commonwealth.

Funding arrangements

The national curriculum is administered by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), a statutory body established by the parliament in 2008 and funded under a National Partnership Agreement (NPA) between the Commonwealth and the states.

Put blundy NPAs might best be characterised as 'sit down money' It incentivises the lazy approach adopted by states in recent years by providing Commonwealth funding for state responsibilities on terms that the states are happy with. Yet they generally do not constitute good policy. The Remote Indigenous Housing Program and the Building the Education Revolution program are two examples of national partnership agreements that have delivered poor outcomes for recipients of state services at little to no political cost for state governments.

NPAs are political motherhood statements that the High Court has held to be completely unenforceable. They receive no endorsement from the Commonwealth Parliamentinstead, the parliament, through legislation, has effectively outsourced part of its responsibility of overseeing Commonwealth expenditure to the executive. Not only are the agreements not legally enforceable; they are undemocratic.

The Commonwealth's contribution in 2010-11 alone amounted to $5-3 million. This was provided direcdy to ACARA instead of the usual practice of states receiving tied grants from the Commonwealth under section 96 of the constitution. This difference is critical. The ability of the Commonwealth to appropriate monies for specific purposes to the states on any terms it thinks fit has been accepted for decades- for instance, the Commonwealth Government withheld previously allocated money from Victoria in the mid-2000s for the EastLink motorway in Melbourne on the basis that it would no longer be toll-free.

The Pape Litigation

In 2009 Bryan Pape, a law lecturer and barrister, challenged an aspect of the then-Rudd Labor government's second fiscal stimulus package; specifically, the Tax Bonus Act, which provided for cash payments to low and middle income earners, with a stated rationale of boosting domestic spending and economic growth in the midst of an economic downturn. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Education and Federalism: The Last Line of Defence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.