Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine

By Tarantolo, Joseph | Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, April 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine


Tarantolo, Joseph, Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry


Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine. Thomas Szasz, Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 2011, 105 pp., $19.95 (hardcover)

In Szasz Under Fire, Szasz is given the opportunity to reply to a dozen well-reasoned critiques and detractions of his philosophical, moral, and medical views. Richard Bentall bravely proclaims that Szasz's "conclusions [that mental illness is a myth] do not stand up to careful scrutiny." Szasz replies lightly, "That is an error: it is my premise," not conclusion.

The power and unnerving nature of Szasz's analyses in the fields of psychiatry and psychology are that he will not allow his detractors to skirt the issue of their premises. For Szasz, an escapee of Nazi eastern Europe in 1938, the essential question is "Who owns you?" In his latest book, Suicide Prohibition, The Shame of Medicine, he offers three potential answers to that question:

1. The State owns you. Until relatively recently most states (of the United States) made suicide- or what Szasz prefers "autohomicide"-a crime. And with the aid of the "therapeutic state," suicidality being deemed a symptom of mental illness, psychiatrists now hold the keys to the locked mental institutions depriving the freedom of suicidal mental patients. In fact, they, the psychiatrists, are responsible and must prevent suicide. Szasz argues forcefully that they do not prevent but prohibit, thus the title of his book.

2. God owns you, or if you prefer to think of "God" as metaphor for "natural," life must follow its natural course. As Jews say in their Yom Kippur service, "Life is a journey. Death is the destination," and only God's natural forces are allowed to deprive someone of life.

3. You own you! Szasz likes to quote the 17th century English philosopher, John Locke who declares man's inherent right to his own life, liberty, and property. And the only legitimate function of the state is to protect those rights. Since you are your own property, it is your choice to live or to take your leave. You belong to you.

One must be careful not to misread into Szasz's work. I could imagine those who misguidedly will surmise somehow that Szasz is a shrill proponent of suicide. He makes it quite clear that it is not for him, or any psychiatrist, let alone any agent of the state to decide whose life is worth living. Nor is it the right or within the ability of an "expert" to determine what is "normal" thinking about such matters. (In other works, he renders the whole notion of "thought disorder" a complete hoax.) If judging the health of one's thinking is beyond us, if our very premise is that we are free to think and act (provided we don't threaten the lives of others) any way we choose, how could we ever have the chutzpah to declare an individual a "threat" to themselves and imprison them (civil commitment in U.S., sectioning in Great Britain), and then call it psychiatric treatment?

In Szasz's view, rather than preventing suicide, the suicide prohibitionists actually make matters worse. They "have succeeded in preventing people from having an honest, private conversation about life and death" (p. 82) because to talk openly subjects the patient potentially to forced hospitalization and the therapist to malpractice legal liability. The notion that it is the duty of the psychiatrist to prevent (prohibit) suicide is abhorrent to Szasz; just another nail in the coffin of self-responsibility. How can a patient trust a doctor who will call the cops/parents/friends at the first mention of suicide consideration? He sums, "Physicians deserve to be lauded for saving the lives of individuals who want to live. Equally, they deserve to be loathed for depriving individuals who want to stop living of the liberty to end their lives" (p. 45).

Szasz's argument against the suicide prohibitionists stands or falls on his insistence that what has come to be called mental illness is not a disease but rather a metaphor for moral, philosophical, political, and social struggle. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.