Notes on the Passing Political Scene

By Goldkamp, Richard | The Human Life Review, Spring 2012 | Go to article overview

Notes on the Passing Political Scene


Goldkamp, Richard, The Human Life Review


Moments before I began working on this commentary in February, I decided to sift quickly through my mail. Among seven solicitations for donations were (as you might expect in this election year) a total of five notices from politicians. But the politicians weren't alone that day. Nonprofit enterprises and lawyers were also pushing their favorite causes. Some of them also wanted to keep the political kettle bubbling.

Money, money, money. Although my routine donation in response to requests was $0.00, 1 know that much of that day's mail dealt with valid and even admirable projects. It didn't matter since I was in no position to help for the moment. I was one of 30 staffers laid off in our weak economy three years ago by the last paper where I worked, after two decades as a copy editor there. Despite Social Security and retirement checks, I'm still trying to halt a downhill slide in resources. Money still matters.

I am far from alone. At this writing, some estimates suggest that almost 25 million Americans are either out of work or underemployed. Creating new jobs and reviving an economy that has been improving only at a snail's pace initially occupied the attention of roughly a dozen candidates in pursuit of the Republican nomination for the presidency - a field that by February had finally narrowed down to four. Many of those candidates were sent to the sidelines by sniping from their own rivals. In fact, many of the negative attack ads were created not by the candidates themselves, but by new Super PACs - political organizations outside any candidate's control, operating without the power to endorse. The candidates, however, regularly picked up on the nastier aspects of those attack ads to sling mud at their rivals.

Meanwhile, with no opposition in the primaries, our current White House occupant had to have been watching gleefully from the sidelines.

Each of the four GOP contestants still in the running as of early March had his own strengths: Mitt Romney, the up-and-down front-runner with executive experience as a former governor, had a financing and campaign organization that his rivals envied. Rick Santorum, happily married and the father of seven children, not only sought to rejuvenate U.S. manufacturing, but stressed the importance of family life, showing a passion about his convictions that enticed some voters. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was widely perceived as politically the most knowledgeable and the best debater still in the chase. And longtime House member Ron Paul stressed the nation's need to bring Washington's spiraling debt back under control, an idea most taxpayers favored.

Which brings us back to the question: Is money all that matters? Important as it is, it's not everything. That applies not only to people in shaky personal situations like mine, but to our country as well. Let's explore why.

In the face of current economic conflicts, international threats, and widespread dissatisfaction with the political class, the candidate who devoted the most attention to America's social issues was undoubtedly Rick Santorum. And at times he paid a severe price - especially from our nation's left-leaning media elite.

A great case in point comes from the pages of my hometown daily, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, when between February 21-23 the paper ran three blistering commentaries about the Catholic Santorum and/or his Church under the following headlines and subheads:

Headline 1: "Rick's religious fanaticism." Subhead: "Politics: Santorum thinks he's found electoral gold in societal wedge issues."

Setting the stage here for Post readers was New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd. To put it mildly, she was less than thrilled with this alleged fanatic's entire brand of politics.

Headline 2: "Reclaiming religious freedom." Subhead: "Contraception: Catholics are called to respect the rights of others as well as their own consciences."

In this piece, published on the same day as Dowd's, the politically correct president of Catholics for Choice, Jon O'Brien, "chose," as a dissenter from both Church teaching and natural law, to hustle artificial birth-control as the best way to keep unwanted children out of our way. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Notes on the Passing Political Scene
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.