A Concurrent Examination of Selfversus- Others Perceptual Bias and the Willingness to Self- Censor: A Study of College Newspaper Editors and Advisers

By Filak, Vincent F. | Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, June 2012 | Go to article overview

A Concurrent Examination of Selfversus- Others Perceptual Bias and the Willingness to Self- Censor: A Study of College Newspaper Editors and Advisers


Filak, Vincent F., Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly


Abstract

This study examines the concepts of perceptual bias and willingness to self-censor (WTSC) to ascertain which factors would influence college newspaper editors' comfort levels with controversial material. Data from 189 matched pairs of college newspaper editors revealed that editors underestimated advisers' comfort levels and that those erroneous estimations were predictive of the editors' comfort levels. In addition, while adviser WTSC was not predictive of editors' comfort levels on several controversial topics, editors' WTSC did predict the editors' comfort with the material.

Keywords

willingness to self-sensor, self-versus-other, perceptual bias, student media, newspaper editors, newspaper advisers

College newspaper editors often square offagainst administrators, faculty members, and other students regarding what a college newspaper should and should not cover. The results of publishing material deemed controversial can be problematic to those papers.

For example, editors at the Fairfield Mirror on the campus of Fairfield University were chastised by the administration for publishing a column regarding the walk of shame, a term used to describe an early morning walk home after sex at someone else's residence. University officials said it was possible that the school would cancel the paper's contract, essentially censoring the paper through financial means.1

At the University of California, Riverside, almost twelve hundred copies of the Highlander disappeared from campus. The newspaper had reported that a student government official, who spent more than $5,000 to fly herself and an intern to a conference, was not authorized to attend the conference, nor was she authorized to make the expenditure.2

However, while some student editors are cowed by retaliatory actions, others are emboldened by them. For example, in April 2008, almost eight thousand copies of the Ball State Daily News were stolen from the racks on the Muncie, Indiana, campus. Officials at the paper speculated that the theftwas related to a story about the arrest of a women's soccer player.3 The editors at the paper reran the entire issue as an insert to the next day's paper, complete with an editorial titled, "Nice try. We're still here."

Even in the face of heavy-handed administrative efforts, some student journalists continue to publish important material that is controversial. The staffof the Northwest Trail at Northwest College in Powell, Wyoming, earned the 2010 College Press Freedom Award for pursuing controversial stories that mattered to their readers. The adviser of the paper, Ron Feemster, was fired after he encouraged students to pursue these types of stories. Even after Feemster was fired, the students continued their reporting on questionable sports recruiting practices and faculty pay equity.4

The question for this study was what makes some editors more comfortable in producing material that can stoke controversy and lead to dire consequences while other editors shy away from it. This study posits that a few key factors are likely at play when it comes to editors' comfort level: their internal fear of what might happen to them, their perception of how the media outlet's adviser might react, and the journalistic environment created by the adviser.

This study was conducted to ascertain which factors were the strongest predictors of the editors' comfort levels with controversial material. First, the study examines the issue through the lens of self-censorship. Scholars have posited that an individual's willingness to self-censor is an intrinsic trait that can be measured accurately and can adequately predict an individual's comfort level when it comes to dealing with public disapproval.5 Using this theory to guide this research, the analysis herein outlines to what degree an intrinsic self-censoring mechanism might limit an editor's comfort level with controversial material.

Second, the study assessed to what degree perceptual bias plays a role in predicting an editor's decision. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Concurrent Examination of Selfversus- Others Perceptual Bias and the Willingness to Self- Censor: A Study of College Newspaper Editors and Advisers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.