Islamic Religiosity and Regime Preferences: Explaining Support for Democracy and Political Islam in Central Asia and the Caucasus

By Collins, Kathleen; Owen, Erica | Political Research Quarterly, September 2012 | Go to article overview

Islamic Religiosity and Regime Preferences: Explaining Support for Democracy and Political Islam in Central Asia and the Caucasus


Collins, Kathleen, Owen, Erica, Political Research Quarterly


Abstract

Does religion or religiosity affect Muslims' regime preferences? Developing constructivist and ideational approaches, we theorize why and how religiosity shapes regime preferences. We test our hypotheses on our novel survey data from Azerbaijan in the Caucasus and Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia. Our findings question civilizationist, rationalist, and modernizationist theories by showing that religiosity among Muslims strongly affects regime preferences for various types of democracy and political Islam. Religious affiliation, however, does not. Finally, we challenge standard measurements of democratic support among Muslims and argue for more nuanced definitions; our surveys generate significant improvements in data for studying these issues.

Keywords

Muslim democracy, political Islam, religiosity, regime preferences, secularism

Religion and Regime Preferences

For several decades scholars, policy makers, and Muslim religious leaders and activists have debated two critical questions: Do Muslims want democracy? Are they inevitably prone to favor some form of political Islam? Put another way, does their religious affiliation or religiosity affect Muslims' regime preferences, or their preferences for a certain type of democracy? These questions have enormous implications, especially as the United States attempts to influence democratic transitions in predominantly Muslim countries from Kyrgyzstan to Afghanistan to Iraq. Universalistic theories often lack systematic testing at the individual level, miss important regional variations, or fail to probe whether Muslim populations understand democracy as Western policy makers and political theorists do. This article addresses these questions in the context of two predominantly Muslim states: Azerbaijan in the Caucasus, and Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia. We developed two original surveys to explore religiosity's effect on individual regime preferences, namely, for varieties of democracy and political Islam. The surveys are novel in distinguishing between secular democracy, as democracy has been ideally defined in Western liberal theory (Locke [1968] 1990, 15-19; Mill 1956, 11-18; Rawls 1993), and Islamic democracy, a religiously oriented democracy advocated by many Muslim activists and theorists (Nasr 2005, 13-15; Khan 2006, 154-65). Our surveys also distinguish among types of political Islam. Contrary to prevailing theories, we find a strong, consistent relationship between religiosity-the depth of individual belief, practice, and commitment to religious ideas-and regime preference.

Our findings contribute theoretically and empirically to two major and interrelated debates about religion and politics. The first is a decades-long, polarizing debate about religion's effect on support for democracy. Huntington's civilizationalist view (1993), as well as many culturalists, expect Islam to determine Muslims' political preferences; Islamic theology and culture, they argue, is inherently undemocratic (Lerner 1958; Lipset 1994; Lewis 1998; Kedourie 1994). Other scholars contend that all religions are "multi-vocal" (Stepan 2000) and that Islam's political role has varied over time (Lapidus 1992); therefore, they argue, Islam is not inherently antidemocratic (Soroush 2002). Public opinion studies consistently argue that Muslim religiosity does not affect democratic support, or that Muslims overwhelmingly support democracy (Tessler 2002; Norris and Inglehart 2004; Esposito and Mogahed 2008).

A second and related debate concerns the roots of popular support for political Islam (Islamism)-a twentieth-twentyfirst century political movement [omit: phenomenon] characterized by [omit: based on] a religio-political [omit: Islamist] ideology that rejects democracy and calls for an Islamic state, law or constitution based [omit: exclusively] on sharìa, or a caliphate (Esposito 1999).1 The civilizationist view, prominent in media and policy circles, roots political Islam in an unchanging, theocratic Islamic religion that is antidemocratic, anti-Western, and jihadist (Huntington 1993). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Islamic Religiosity and Regime Preferences: Explaining Support for Democracy and Political Islam in Central Asia and the Caucasus
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.