Using the RIGHT STRATEGY to Mediate Environmental Disputes

By Bickerman, John | Dispute Resolution Journal, May-July 2012 | Go to article overview

Using the RIGHT STRATEGY to Mediate Environmental Disputes


Bickerman, John, Dispute Resolution Journal


Environmental disputes present some of the most interesting, challenging, complicated, and daunting issues that a mediator may confront. These cases fall into two broad categories-statutory claims and natural resources conflicts. Stat - utory claims involve rights that have been established by federal law. Most often, the United States en forces these rights on behalf of the general public, in civil suits brought in federal court.

By comparison, natural resource conflicts are usually complex multiparty clashes over resources such as water, fisheries, or endangered species. These conflicts often confront the allocation of scarce re - sources among multiple legitimate interests. As these disputes have often simmered for decades, they tend to involve parties who are highly emotional about the issues and whose perspectives and cultural differences often polarize them from each other. It follows that the role of the mediator changes depending on the nature of the dispute. Also, the same style won't work for all types of environmental matters.

Statutory Claims

Statutory claims most often involve enforcement actions brought by the U.S. Government under the following laws:

(1) The "Superfund" statute (Com - prehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 46 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (1980)) for harm to land.

(2) The Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq. (1972)), for water pollution.

(3) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (1970)), for air pollution.

In addition, there is a private right of action under Superfund that potentially responsible parties (PRPs) can use to seek contribution from other PRPs, including the United States. (For example, contribution claims have been made against the United States by government contractors who performed work at certain World War II sites under the direction or control of the U.S. Government.)

A Superfund dispute has fewer "moving parts" (i.e., negotiable issues) than other environmental conflicts. Superfund defendants (including the United States) generally will agree to pay money or accept a fixed percentage of future cleanup costs in return for receiving a release or partial release of liability. Consequently, the mediator's role is to manage a fact-intensive discussion of the causes of the contamination, the cost of the remedy, and whether there are other PRPs to whom a share of liability should be allocated.

Clean Air Act enforcement cases have similar parameters. Since March 2000, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered into 29 Clean Air Act settlements involving 106 refineries in 32 states, representing over 90% of the country's refining capacity. In most of these cases, the EPA has sought compliance with a complex set of rules requiring refineries to meet stricter standards for new sources of pollution (the New Source Review (NSR) Rules). In de - termining the enforcement penalty for violating these rules, the EPA considers the economic benefit (i.e., costs saved) the refinery received for operating outside the rules (the BEN model), and then compares it to costs incurred by a refinery that had appropriate clean air controls. In fact, the EPA has used the BEN model since 1984 to calculate the economic benefit from delayed and avoided compliance with EPA rules.

The factors used in this model can be the subject of considerable negotiation by the parties to Clean Air Act cases and some of the statutory penalties can be partially avoided by having the defendant agree to undertake supplemental environmental projects (SEPs) that will benefit the local community affected by the alleged air pollution (e.g., purchasing emergency response equipment).

The BEN factors give the mediator and the parties a few more dimensions with which to crafta negotiated settlement. However, because the resolution of statutory claims pivots on how much money the defendant will pay, notwithstanding the various de vices available to the parties and the mediator to manipulate that amount, the negotiation is frequently a "zero sum" game. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Using the RIGHT STRATEGY to Mediate Environmental Disputes
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.