Fights of the Femenists

By Gold, Tanya | The Spectator, September 15, 2012 | Go to article overview

Fights of the Femenists


Gold, Tanya, The Spectator


When it comes to sheer nastiness in public debate women are now more than equal to men.

Naomi Wolf's Vagina is not an organ so significant it needs italics; it is a book, and a catalyst for a swiftly assembled feminist lynch mob. In the New Statesman , Laur ie Penny wro te, 'Naom i Wolf's Vagina is crassly attention-seeking. . .

It's upsetting to see a prominent feminist having what can only be described as a dramatic public meltdown.' She had another go in the Independent : 'Claims that the vagina is "not only co-extensive with the female brain but also is part of the female soul" are frankly offensive. . . today's young women deserve better.'

In the Times Janice Turner complained that Wolf had 'medically unnecessary major spinal surgery' to restore her vaginal orgasms.

'You can, it seems, ' wrote Turner, 'bring down the patriarchy with a Rampant Rabbit.' In the Evening Standard Anne McElvoy wrote, 'It takes a lot to put me off feminism, but one more book from Naomi Wolf might just do the trick.' There was more bad news for Wolf as she hawked Vagina around town - a poor review in the Guardian , a slap from Jenni Murray on Women's Hour and, eventually, a request from Rod Liddle to be invited to all of Wolf's parties anywhere in the world, at any time, without notice.

That we should waste time attacking Wolf Vagina when there is so much else to do, for is a sentence any of these women could, and should, have written. To say that we should fall on each other's writing as carcasses to be chewed is to ignore the way the media affects our culture. Show me a woman who joins the struggle because Janice was hilariously sarcastic about Naomi and Laurie got two columns out of it and I'll show you a white line round the corpse of feminism. The pay gap, so glibly reported by Liza Mundy in The Spectator last week as 10 per cent, is 20 per cent if you include part-time workers, rising to 27 per cent in the private sector and 25 per cent in the South East. . The idea that women are 'the richer sex' is adorable but untrue, unless your sample pool is Jemima Khan and her hairdresser and you therefore really believe that there will be 'quotas for men' in boardrooms within a generation.

There is mass female unemployment (up 160,000 since 2009, while for men it's down by 30,000), growing female poverty as welfare is cut (most British carers are female) and, around the world, we have ordinary violence and a comprehensive assault on women's reproductive rights. The answer is not to abolish Naomi Wolf because she wrote Vagina. We need an army.

Are the women attacking Vagina guilty of the same crimes they attribute to Wolf - snobbery, monomania, not paying attention to the Things That Matter, Which Do Not Include Your Minge, Naomi? Newspaper columnists accusing each other of elitism and attention-seeking is a game that will always end in stalemate. Ideally, women who define themselves as feminists should want the same thing; more of everything for women - money, orgasms, sweeties, books about vaginas. If Naomi Wolf wants to write a love letter to her vagina, or earlobe, or knee, I will applaud her. Wolf is a hot, rich feminist with great boobs, and her cares are those of the hot, rich feminist with great boobs. Better orgasms are not a terrible thing to want, even if there is more to want; of course Vagina is niche.

Feminists love to fight, because many of us are writers, neurotics, professional screamers and builders of straw men. Good columns are rarely fair; I doubt Naomi Wolf daydreams she is our leader, as Janice Turner wrote, and I doubt Wolf 'won't be able to rest easy until all of womankind has heard her gospel and has started having sex that is not just pleasurable, but worthwhile', as Zoe Heller wrote, with a murderous italic, in the New York Review of Books. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Fights of the Femenists
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.