A Review of Enrico Colombatto, "Markets, Morals and Policy-Making. A New Defence of Free-Market Economics"1

By Marciano, Alain | The European Journal of Comparative Economics, July 1, 2012 | Go to article overview

A Review of Enrico Colombatto, "Markets, Morals and Policy-Making. A New Defence of Free-Market Economics"1


Marciano, Alain, The European Journal of Comparative Economics


A review of Enrico Colombatto, "Markets, Morals and Policy-Making. A new defence of free-market economics"1

Enrico Colombatto's Markets, Morals and Policy-Making. A new defence of freemarket economics is a rich and dense and invaluable 200-page long book. Obviously, it would not be easy to review honestly its multiple dimensions - the methodology, history and ethical foundations of economics, and the interactions between economics and other social sciences - and the many important questions - social change and how institutions and ideas combine in the functioning of human societies, poverty, growth and economic crises as well as the moral principles on which our societies are based - it deals with. I will rather focus on one of its main aspects: the book is not just another defence of free-markets and free-market economics. On the contrary, I believe and insist that Colombatto weaves around the three keywords of the title a provocative but truly original thesis about free-market economics and he relates his claims to the issue of the foundations of economic policy-making.

Colombatto starts with the idea that, as one can observe, "the large majority of the population does support substantial government intervention in most areas of economic activities" (p. 82). Therefore, to him, the relevant attitude towards state intervention through policy-making should not consist in examining the virtues of specific rules - for instance, asking whether rule A is better than rule B or how to devise even better rules. More fundamentally, the question bears on the legitimation of government intervention itself. From this perspective, the claim Colombatto puts forward is rather negative. He thus argues that "the economic way of reasoning prevailing today is mostly inadequate for understanding the nature and legitimacy of policy-making" (p. 3; emphasis added); in which adequate means from a free-market perspective. Thus, the book is aimed at explaining what is a free-market approach and, as a corollary, at emphasizing the differences with what the views developed and promoted by those who claim to be free-market scholars.

About the latter point, upon which I will come back later, I already stress what one of the central and fascinating claims of the book: even those who are viewed and view themselves as pro-market scholars are not able to adequately defends their views: "a free-market approach built on consequentialism or wishful thinking will falter whenever a crisis strikes and necessarily force its advocates to acquiesce to some version of the third way" (p. 3). Thus, at best, the standard and well-known free-market approaches that are used in economics are only able to defend a third way between socialism and liberalism. The reason is that there is only one way to legitimate policy-making from a free-market perspective and it consists in adopting a moral principle: "the foundations of free-market thinking originate from moral philosophy" (p. 3). It is because economists have forgotten this fundamental principle that they are now incapable of envisaging a form of policy-making that would not imply more state intervention for the common good. It seems that free-market supporters and pro-state advocates all tend towards a similar - if not exactly the same - way of founding policy-making. They all share "a fairly peculiar notion of economics" (p. 32) which "consists of an enlarged version of the original Keynesian proposal, according to which the technocrat has explicitly replaced the politician" (p. 28).

Colombatto dates the origins of its incapacity in the evolution of the discipline since the beginning of the 19th century - "economics went the wrong way at the beginning of the nineteenth century" (p. 209). It results from a slow driftaway from the political economy approach of the founders of the discipline and towards a "hard" science, interested only in modeling mechanical systems, in understanding under which conditions interactions between rational utility functions maximizing "robots" produce order (peace), stability, efficient allocation of resources and general (or partial) equilibria. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Review of Enrico Colombatto, "Markets, Morals and Policy-Making. A New Defence of Free-Market Economics"1
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.