Social Entrepreneur Development: An Integration of Critical Pedagogy, the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Acs Model
Prieto, Leon C., Phipps, Simone T. A., Friedrich, Tamara L., Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal
It is essential to identify and develop social entrepreneurs in order to solve some of the complex problems facing various communities. In this article, the authors draw on the works of Paulo Friere, as well as The Center for Leadership Development's Assess, Challenge, Support (ACS) model and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), to serve as a blueprint for Social Entrepreneur Development (SED). The authors assessed the social entrepreneurial intentions scores of African-American and Hispanic college students and found that they possess low intentions to become social entrepreneurs. The Theory of Planned Behavior, the ACS model, and critical pedagogy serve as a guide to develop tomorrow's agents of change and to increase their intentions to become social entrepreneurs.
Keywords: Social entrepreneurship, critical pedagogy, theory of planned behavior, ACS model, social entrepreneur development
Universities and other institutions may want to train and develop tomorrow's agents of change in order to bring about positive social change in disadvantaged communities. Social entrepreneur development, which is the process of equipping individuals with the knowledge, skills, and resources to enable them to positively impact society through social entrepreneurial ventures, may be the best way to bring about this social transformation. Social entrepreneurship is emerging as an inventive approach for dealing with complex social needs (Johnson, 2002). With its emphasis on problem-solving and social innovation, socially entrepreneurial activities blur the traditional boundaries between the public, private and non-profit sector, and emphasize hybrid models of for-profit and non-profit activities (Johnson, 2002). Thompson, Alvy, and Lees (2000) described social entrepreneurship as the process of applying entrepreneurial principles to creative vision, leadership, and the will to succeed in inducing social change. Social entrepreneurs are different from business entrepreneurs in many ways. The key difference is that social entrepreneurs set out with an explicit social mission in mind. Their main objective is to make the world a better place. The job of the social entrepreneur is to recognize when a part of society is not working and to solve the problem by fixing the system, spreading solutions and persuading entire societies to take new leaps (Drayton, 2005).
Some minority college students have succeeded in making a difference in their communities, and their vision coupled with social entrepreneurial training could be instrumental in reducing many social ills, including poverty, crime, and discrimination. African American and Hispanic undergraduate students should be developed as social entrepreneurs so that they can be equipped to create ventures that bring about meaningful change in disadvantaged communities.
COLLEGE STUDENTS AND SOCIAL CHANGE
The role of college students as agents of change has been identified through various movements and occurrences of activism that involved student-initiated collective action against authoritative social and political structures (Mars, 2009). Lipset and Schaflander (1971) identified such movements and activism as far back as the student involvement in the nineteenth century revolutionary movements in France, Germany, and Italy. More recently, student activism has been widely recognized through the demonstrations of the civil rights movement, protests against America's involvement in the Vietnam conflict, and collective support for the divestment of South African Apartheid (Mars, 2009). Students have also been shown to engage in grassroots leadership that was intended on creating organizational change within colleges and universities (Mars, 2009). For example, over the past two decades a new form of student activism has emerged on campuses around the country (Rhoads, Buenavista, & Maldonado, 2004).
Campus organizations representing students of color have increasingly united for the purpose of enhancing academic support for students from underrepresented or marginalized ethnic or racial backgrounds (Rhoads, Buenavista, & Maldonado, 2004). …