Federalism's Frontier

By Greve, Michael S. | Texas Review of Law & Politics, Fall 2002 | Go to article overview

Federalism's Frontier


Greve, Michael S., Texas Review of Law & Politics


I. INTRODUCTION

September 11 was supposed to change everything, including federalism. Federalism has in fact become more problematic, and the Supreme Court's federalism suggests an alarming obtuseness to political realities. But the reasons for the incongruence between the Supreme Court's federalism and the nation's vulnerabilities have nothing to do with terrorists; they have to do with trial lawyers.

11. THE NATiON'S WAR, AND THE COURT'S

September 11 seemed to signal federalism's impending demise. Like any war, the thinking went, the war against terror would bring new respect for the national government, and wartime measures would entail new national programs and responsibilities.1 The Supreme Court would have to revisit-and perhaps abandon-federalism.2 Those predictions, though, have proven false. The federal government has grown, but mostly for reasons and in areas (from education3 to agriculture4 to corporate governance) far removed from the war against terror. The Supreme Court, for its part, stayed its federalism course during the 2001-2002 Term6 and, for the 2002-2003 Term, has IMAGE FORMULA7

already granted certiorari in a number of significant cases concerning federalism.

Predictions of federalism's demise rested principally on the belief that federalism-or at any rate, the Supreme Court's federalism-distrusts the national government.8 That distrust is a "luxury of peaceful times,"9 and we no longer have that luxury. But the notion that the national government must be trusted or distrusted tout ensemble is only plausible, if at all, at an absurd level of generality.10At a constitutional level, federalism is about discreet powers. While the Rehnquist Court has of course limited the national government's powers vis-a-vis the states, it has not constrained, and will not constrain, any powers that the national government conceivably might need in the war against terror. What has become problematic is not judicial federalism per se, but its point and purpose.

The Rehnquist Court has waged its federalism campaign on behalf of "states' rights" against national impositions, but the rehabilitation of a plausible, constitutional federalism is a twofront war. Federalism surely must limit the national government's powers over the states and protect intergovernmental immunities (in some domain, to some extent). However, it must also protect states from aggression and exploitation by other states; moreover, it must protect the common economic market from regulatory balkanization.11

The New Deal Court dismantled the horizontal federalism norms that once safeguarded those principles. 12 We are now IMAGE FORMULA9

paying the price of that constitutional mass destruction. Unimpeded by constitutional injunctions, trial lawyers and activist state attorneys general are launching assaults on sister states. As shown below, the product liability crisis-as well as state litigation campaigns against the tobacco, financial, and pharmaceutical industries-demonstrate that state aggression presents an increasingly serious economic and constitutional problem. 13 The leaders of those campaigns proudly sail under the banner of "federalism and states' rights." Their initiatives, however, are not simply an attack on corporate America (which may deserve it); they are also, and inherently, an assault on the integrity, autonomy, and equality of sister states. The trial lawyers' states' rights parochialism is a false federalism and the antithesis of the real thing. It is "the spirit which must either be killed, or else it will kill the Constitution of the United States.",14

The Rehnquist Court has ignored federalism's horizontal dimension. Worse yet, by exalting "states' rights" vis-ii-vis the national government, the Court has provided the false federalists with potent ammunition. The Court will never prevent the nation from preempting Iraq. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Federalism's Frontier
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.