Commerce with Conscience: Human Rights and Corporate Codes of Conduct

By Turcotte, Marie-France | Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, March 1998 | Go to article overview

Commerce with Conscience: Human Rights and Corporate Codes of Conduct


Turcotte, Marie-France, Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration


Commerce with Conscience: Human Rights and Corporate Codes of Conduct

Craig Forcese. Montreal, QC: International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development, 1997, 80 pp.

This book is about corporate codes of conduct in relation to human rights and sustainable development. The first part describes the general situation. The second part presents the results of a survey conducted in the 100 largest Canadian firms with operations in foreign countries. The survey reveals the corporate contribution to the protection of human rights to be less than exemplary.

Forecese reports estimates that nearly 80% of major American enterprises and 60% of Canadian ones have codes of conduct. However, an examination of the content of these codes mostly reveals statements whose aim is to protect firms against possible embezzlement by employees. When they do mention ethical aspects, the object is to avoid acts liable to legal sanction. Moreover the study shows that a majority of the enterprises have no code of conduct concerning fundamental human rights and are reluctant to discuss this aspect of their relations toward their workers in foreign countries. Indeed, only one in five enterprises studied had adopted a code of conduct with respect to its international activities.

Forcese concludes that "corporate social responsibility ranks low on the list of code priorities" (p. 14). Forcese's statement is based on a broad definition of corporate social responsibility. According to this approach, the firm's reponsibility is toward all its stakeholders, that is, all the groups that can have an effect or be affected by the firm's activities. The previous definition of the goal of corporate social responsibility was to humanise capitalism by trying to limit injustices that can be associated with it. According to Forcese's analysis, current corporate code of conduct practices do not constitute an instrument for the humanisation of capitalism. At best, they can contribute to the implementation of laws. The efficacy of the codes depends on the existence of outside mechanisms to ensure their implementation.

The neo-liberal definition of corporate social responsibility, on the other hand, limits corporate responsibilitites to shareholders and the law. One could argue, based on this definition, that current practices adequately correspond with corporate social responsibilities. However, corporations operating in countries where the laws are insufficient or applied inadequately without codes of human rights and sustainable development are exposing themselves and their shareholders to political risk. Forcese quotes many cases of multinational enterprises subjected to deep criticism and boycotts following the abuse of human rights in their factories abroad or in those of their suppliers. In response to these pressures, several of these companies have adopted a code of conduct pertaining to human rights for their international activities.

In 1992, for example, Levi Strauss was the object of embarrassing revelations in the Washington Post about the conditions to which female workers were subjected in Levi Strauss's subcontractors' factories. Consequently, the firm decided to adopt norms respecting the environment, ethics, health and security, and work that applied to both subcontractors and suppliers. The company also adopted an internal surveillance mechanism for the application of its code. It included a questionnaire, unannounced inspections, and the possibility of contract cancellations in the case of a code violation.

Nike also introduced a code of conduct in 1992, following complaints about the exploitative conditions of its workers in factories abroad. Similarly, Home Depot, Timberland, Wal-Mart, and JC Penney have codes of conduct applicable to their retailers. Sears Roebuck also adopted for a code of conduct in 1992 in order to avoid purchasing products made by Chinese prisoners.

The Reebok company, a long time supporter of Amnesty International, initially introduced a code of conduct for its operations in China, and eventually applied it to the rest of its operations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Commerce with Conscience: Human Rights and Corporate Codes of Conduct
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.