Per Curiams Revisited: Assessing the Unsigned Opinion

By Gizzi, Michael C.; Wasby, Stephen L. | Judicature, November/December 2012 | Go to article overview

Per Curiams Revisited: Assessing the Unsigned Opinion


Gizzi, Michael C., Wasby, Stephen L., Judicature


A descriptive analysis of the use of per curiam opinions by the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals.

Per curiam opinions and other dispositions designated per curiam ("through the court") are an important component of the output of the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. courts of appeals, and the Justices have at times given them an especially prominent role in certain policy areas. The per curiam designation is used in a variety of situations, not only in simple, routine cases, and indeed per curiams are not always unanimous, with an increase over the Supreme Court's history in per curiams accompanied by dissents. The Supreme Court has varied over time in the frequency of per curiam opinions and in the situations in which the "per curiam" label is used, just as there is variation throughout each term in the frequency of appearance of per curiams. There is also variation in the courts of appeals in the use of the per curiam label and in the proportion of dispositions that, because the author is not identified, are the functional equivalent of per curiams.

We address the subject of per curiam opinions because it is important to know how courts dispose of all their cases, not only those on major issues and hot-button topics but also others that may be less important individually but which, taken together, can be as important as cases that receive much more attention. Equally important is understanding how all appellate courts, not only the Supreme Court, make decisions: per curiam dispositions are also used in important ways in the U.S. courts of appeals.

In this article, we consolidate the limited literature about per curiams and provide additional information about them. First, we add to the prior treatment of per curiam dispositions in the Supreme Court; we follow this with information on patterns on use of per curiams over time, both over the years and within the Court's term. We also add new information by examining the courts of appeals' use of per curiams and their functional equivalents. These courts dwarf the Supreme Court in terms of volume of decisions and law made; the frequent use of the per curiams there, then, demands attention similar to that paid to them in the Supreme Court. Finally, examples of research that could be undertaken are provided so that even more can be learned about per curiam opinions; material on who writes per curiam opinions is presented, because, while formally "through the court," they have individual authors who can be identified.

The use of per curiams on the Supreme Court

Today roughly one out of every ten opinions issued by the Supreme Court is unsigned or "per curiam." In the 65 years covered by the Supreme Court Database, these opinions represent almost 18 percent of all dispositions. The use of per curiam opinions, however, remains one of the most under studied areas of the work of the Supreme Court. In addition to a recent normative law review article1 which provides no recent data, the extant literature is limited to two primary studies - one by political scientists in two articles in 1992 and another two historical studies by a law professor a decade later.2 In addition, Wasby, D'Amato, and Metrailer, in the course of an examination of Supreme Court strategy in the desegregation cases, identified per curiam opinions as an important tool used by the Court.3 Thus what Wasby, Peterson, Schubert, and Schubert said in Judicature twenty years ago, that "the per curiam opinion is one of the basic tools the U.S. Supreme Court has adopted to announce its decisions," and that "remarkably little work has been done to clarify its nature and uses," remains true today.4

We first look at the distribution of the use of per curiam opinions from the Vinson Court through the Roberts Court, covering the 1946-2011 Terms. (See Tables 1 and 2). The use of per curiam opinions was most frequent (28.7%) during the Warren Court and declined thereafter, through the Burger (17. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Per Curiams Revisited: Assessing the Unsigned Opinion
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.