One Leg to Stand On: The Treaty Power and Congressional Authority for the Endangered Species Act after United States V. Lopez

By Villareal, Gavin R. | Texas Law Review, April 1998 | Go to article overview

One Leg to Stand On: The Treaty Power and Congressional Authority for the Endangered Species Act after United States V. Lopez


Villareal, Gavin R., Texas Law Review


One Leg to Stand On: The Treaty Power and Congressional Authority for the Endangered Species Act After United States v. Lopez^

"I have a question for you," said a young associate at a law firm where I clerked during the summer of 1996. "Can you explain to me what cave beetles and blind salamanders have to do with interstate commerce?"

It does not tax the imagination to picture a federal judge asking exactly the same question in the very near future. Since its passage in 1973, the Endangered Species Act1 (ESA) has been a lightning rod for controversy and criticism. Developers have fought against those who would restrict the uses of their property based on the presence of federally protected wildlife, while environmentalists have fought to preserve native habitats for rare species that teeter on the brink of extinction.2 At issue often have been the limits the federal government can impose upon private property owners' use of their own land for the claimed greater good of preserving the diversity of the national native environment.3

Today, more than the end results of the far-reaching federal legislation are under attack. The very basis for congressional authority to promulgate national legislation for the protection of endangered wildlife and their habitats faces a potential challenge. For more than sixty years, the Supreme Court interpreted the Commerce Clause of the U.S.

Constitution,4 one of the major foundations of congressional authority for the ESA, as an expansive grant of power to Congress. Since the time of early Commerce Clause cases, the Court has shown little reluctance to expansively interpret the authority this constitutional power gives Congress, and, especially since the New Deal era, the Court has often held that the Commerce Clause authorizes Congress to regulate and control actions which seem far removed from interstate commerce. Indeed, in the recent past, Congress had apparently become so confident of its power to pass national legislation under the ambit of the Commerce Clause that some of the legislation it did pass contained only scant mention of the intention to regulate interstate commerce, if any mention was included at all.5 Congress could feel secure that the Supreme Court would find a "rational basis"6 for the connection between the regulated act and interstate commerce and in so doing would find the legislation to pass constitutional muster. This security evaporated with the Court's decision in United States v. Lopez,7 in which the Court for the first time in almost sixty years overturned a congressional act it found to be beyond the power granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause. Suddenly, the validity of a long list of previous congressional acts came into question.8

The ESA is on that list.9 While some parts of the Act, such as the prohibitions of the trade or selling of animals protected under the ESA's definitions,10 arguably have a clear connection to interstate commerce, other portions of the Act seem to be much less strongly connected to this essential requirement. The crucial ability to protect the habitats of endangered species by regulating the uses of private property on which those species exist is particularly vulnerable to a Lopez-based attack. Without this power, the ability of the ESA to accomplish its stated goals is doubtful. As the implications of Lopez are played out in the lower federal courts, and as more congressional acts are found not to meet the suddenly stricter standards developed by the Court in Lopez,11 defenders of the ESA would be well advised to begin looking for alternative bases for congressional authority for the protection of threatened wildlife before the judicial hatchet falls.

This Note explores the bases for congressional authority to promulgate the ESA. Part I begins with an introduction to the Act itself, including the history of its passage and the goals it was meant to accomplish. An understanding of these goals is necessary for the purpose of exploring ways in which Congress can legitimately legislate to accomplish them. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

One Leg to Stand On: The Treaty Power and Congressional Authority for the Endangered Species Act after United States V. Lopez
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.