Leveling the Playing Field in David V. Goliath: Remedies to Agency Overreach

By Schiff, Damien M.; Wake, Luke A. | Texas Review of Law & Politics, Fall 2012 | Go to article overview

Leveling the Playing Field in David V. Goliath: Remedies to Agency Overreach


Schiff, Damien M., Wake, Luke A., Texas Review of Law & Politics


I. INTRODUCTION

For the past two decades, small business owners have consistently reported that regulatory burdens, and the onerous paperwork that compliance requires, are among their top concerns.1 They know firsthand how difficult it can be to obtain the necessary approvals and to meet multifarious regulatory requirements simply to make an honest living. They must navigate through the complexities of an ever-changing regulatory system governing their daily activities.2

Whereas a Fortune 500 company will have a team of compliance officers and attorneys ready to tackle regulatory issues like a swarm of wasps, a typical small business has only ten employees and lacks the financial resources to address regulatory roadblocks in the same manner.3 Without a standing army of experts, small businesses cannot efficiently clear regulatory hurdles; therefore, the cost of compliance is necessarily higher for them.4 Indeed, small business owners are put in a real bind when they cannot obtain or afford necessary permits, when their costs of compliance are too high, or when they are faced with litigating a case against a federal agency with a large and comparatively bottomless budget. Regulatory burdens bar entry into the market. They prevent many potential businesses from getting offthe ground and sometimes force business owners to forgo business opportunities, downsize, or fold up shop.5

Small business owners understand how frustrating it can be to work with regulators because they must do so on a regular basis. A typical individual, however, will inevitably feel the same frustrations when confronted with a regulatory problem in his or her personal life. Something as seemingly simple as obtaining a permit to build a modest addition to a home-on one's own property-can become an administrative nightmare. Most individuals, like most small businesses, lack the resources to defend their rights when they fall under the bureaucratic thumb of indiscriminate regulators.6

Regulators exacerbate this problem when they adopt a "shoot first, ask questions later" mentality, as demonstrated in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency.7 Decided this past Term in the United States Supreme Court, the case concerned the troubles of Mike and Chantell Sackett-an ordinary couple of modest means. In 2007, the Sacketts received a compliance order from the EPA alleging that they had violated the Clean Water Act (CWA)8 when they began construction on their dream home on an approximately half-acre patch of dry land in the Idaho panhandle.9 In the compliance order, the EPA asserted that the Sacketts' property was a jurisdictional wetland, but the order provided no evidence to substantiate the allegation.10 The Sacketts wished to contest the EPA's jurisdiction over their property, but the couple was denied any opportunity to challenge the Agency's compliance order. 11 According to the EPA, their only option was to take immediate action to remedy the alleged violation or face ruinous fines of as much as $75,000 per day.12 The Sacketts had to fight all the way to the Supreme Court simply for the chance to contest the EPA's jurisdiction to issue the compliance order-an order that was issued without any probable cause that the Sacketts had violated the law and without on-site analysis to confirm the existence of federally regulable wetlands.13 The absence of probable cause and supporting evidence is particularly troubling given that a jurisdictional wetlands determination is very fact-intensive and site-specific.14 Ultimately, the Supreme Court would hold that the Sacketts had a right to sue the EPA pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act.15

In their victory in the Supreme Court, the Sacketts not only vindicated their individual rights, they established the important precedent that a federal agency cannot issue a compliance order without giving its recipient a meaningful opportunity to contest the agency's jurisdiction.16 Previously, the EPA could issue compliance orders on a whim, based only on speculative conjecture as to whether the property in question was in fact a jurisdictional wetland. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Leveling the Playing Field in David V. Goliath: Remedies to Agency Overreach
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.