Catch-22: The Eeoc's Controversial Guidance on the Use of Criminal History Information by Employers

By Bible, Jon D. | Labor Law Journal, Spring 2013 | Go to article overview

Catch-22: The Eeoc's Controversial Guidance on the Use of Criminal History Information by Employers


Bible, Jon D., Labor Law Journal


I. Introduction

In April of 2012, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC] published new Enforcement Guidance on the extent to which, under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act,1 employers may consider arrest and conviction records in making employment decisions.2 After several false starts, and by a 4-1 vote of its members, the EEOC acted in recognition of the fact that, aided by the internet, most employers now examine the criminal history of applicants and need updated assistance in this area. This is especially true given the EEOC's announcement in early 2012 of a $3.13 million settlement with Pepsi involving charges of discrimination in its criminal background check policies.3 The Guidance represents the EEOC's first comprehensive policy statement in over 20 years and supersedes all prior statements. It focuses on race and national origin discrimination, the Title VII protected classes that the EEOC has decided are most often implicated in the use of criminal history in employment decisions.

No sooner had the Guidance appeared than interest groups began protesting it. The main complaint is that it puts employers in a Catch-22. Not only do they potentially face losses via theft, fraud, etc. if they hire someone with a criminal past, but they risk being sued for negligent hiring if that person harms a third party and it is later revealed that a background check would have alerted the employer to this possibility; they also face liability if they fail to conduct a check required by state or local law. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that resume fraud - lying about one's background, including whether one has a criminal history - has reached epidemic proportions; this gives employers a greater incentive to do independent checks.

For an employer to disqualify someone based on a check may, however, open the door to a Title VII discrimination claim. Under the disparate treatment theory, an employer can be liable for treating people differently based on a protected trait, e.g. hiring a white person but not a Hispanic with comparable criminal histories. The disparate impact theory prohibits policies that have a disproportionate impact on a protected group and are not justified by business necessity. Because African- Americans and Hispanics are arrested and convicted more often than whites, a policy of excluding applicants with a criminal history could run afoul of this theory.

This paper discusses the EEOC Guidance. Parts one and two discuss legal difficulties that an employer may face if it does or does not conduct a criminal history check. Part three focuses on the main features of the Guidance and objections that have been leveled against it.

II. Legal Issues Raised by the Failure to Conduct a Check

A. Negligent hiring

Although it has been recognized since the early 1900's, the negligent hiring doctrine has become a hot topic in the last quarter century.4 People injured by an employee may regard it as a way to hold the employer - the deep pocket - liable for the conduct or getting a settlement offer. Negligent hiring claims have proliferated to the point that one observer has said they are "as popular as hot-selling pancakes"; employers lose 72% of the time and the compensation awarded may exceed a million dollars.5 Potential areas of vulnerability include all stages of employment from recruiting to hiring, applicant screening to performance evaluations, and employee assistant programs to post-employment references. Lawsuits may involve independent contractors and paid, volunteer, or part-time workers as well as full-time employees.6

Two closely related torts are negligent entrustment and negligent retention. The former occurs if an employee harms someone while performing a task that the employer knew or should have known she was ill-equipped to handle.7 The upshot of the negligent retention doctrine is that the duty of the employer does not end when an employee is hired, but instead extends to retaining fit help. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Catch-22: The Eeoc's Controversial Guidance on the Use of Criminal History Information by Employers
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.