Guns and Membership in the American Polity

By Gulasekaram, Pratheepan | The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, December 2012 | Go to article overview

Guns and Membership in the American Polity


Gulasekaram, Pratheepan, The William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal


Introduction

The gun is mythic in the American imagination. James Madison extolled its transformative and signifying powers when he argued in the Federalist Papers that "the advantage of being armed" is a characteristic that "Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation."1 This "advantage," in the hands of militiamen, has provided the foundation for our nation's creation stories,2 but it has also been the catalyst for some of our nation's most inexplicable tragedies.3 Vacillating be tween these poles of heroism and heartbreak, firearms have remained at the center of the nation's political, legal, and historical consciousness. All along, one aspect of Madison's contention perseveres: the gun - its availability to the civilian population,4 its use for both public and private ends,5 and the violence associated with it6 - has steadfastly remained uniquely American.7

Access to, and use of, firearms has helped define ideas of membership in America. The gun played a vital role in the genesis tales of the Republic itself. It was a bullet fired into a British officer by a militia man in Lexington, Massachusetts on April 19, 1775, that is credited with igniting the war for independence;8 it was the gun that helped tame the wilderness and battle American Indians in stories of the expanding nineteenth-century frontier;9 and firearms were credited with shoring up the struggle for political and racial equality during Reconstruction after the Civil War.10 In all of these manifestations - as a tool of resistance to tyranny, an instrument of imperialism, a method of survival and self-protection, and a pathway to political inclusion - the gun facilitated formation of, and inclusion in, the American polity.

Concomitantly, however, the gun has also demarcated the borders of exclusion as well. Despite a thriving firearms trade with Indians,11 several colonial and early state laws reflected discomfort with the idea of arming them, sometimes forbidding or limiting such trade.12 Guns that were sold to Indians were often inferior, ensuring that whites would maintain an advantage over them.13 Similarly, possession by slaves and free blacks was heavily regulated.14 According to federal law, the militia of the several states was to be comprised only of white citizens, and some state constitutions made clear that "negroes, mulattoes, and Indians" were excluded from such participation.15 In the mid-nineteenth century, a majority of the Supreme Court seemed bemused by the idea that a freed slave could be a citizen of the United States. 16 To consider him such, the Dred Scott majority opined, would mean not only that blacks could travel and speak as they wished, but could also own guns.17 Surely, the Court reasoned, the founding fathers would not have been so unmindful of the safety of white citizens to have permitted such an absurd consequence.18

Even after the Civil War and the Reconstruction Amendments, Black Codes in several states attempted to strip newly freed slaves from firearm possession, facilitating the ability of state and local militia forces and armed groups to terrorize the newly freed population.19 And, coincident with large-scale immigration and the first comprehensive federal immigration laws, several turn of the century gun statutes excluded noncitizens from gun possession based on notions of foreigners' proclivity towards violence.20 Even in present day, over twenty states and the federal government maintain alienage restrictions in their firearms statutes, differentiating between citizens and noncitizens for certain aspects of firearm purchase and possession.21 And, firearms offenses are among the crimes listed under the Immigration and Nationality Act22 that place noncitizens in danger of deportation.23

Recent Supreme Court cases have exacerbated confusion over the inclusiveness of the Second Amendment. District of Columbia v. Heller2* established that the right to bear arms inured to individuals, based in part on the utility of handguns for selfdefense. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Guns and Membership in the American Polity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.